Sexual assaults and violent rages… Inside the dark world of Buddhist teacher Sogyal Rinpoche by Mick Brown

 

Sogyal

Sogyal Rinpoche as a guest speaker at a healing seminar in Melbourne in 2004 Credit: Getty images

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/sexual-assaults-violent-rages-inside-dark-world-buddhist-teacher/

This article by a veteran journalist writing for the Telegraph gets to the bottom of how undue influence is the key to understanding the phenomenon of Sogyal the violent sexual deviant, and person addicted to the very lifestyle his teachings were  supposed to address.

In August last year, Sogyal Rinpoche, the Tibetan lama whose book The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying has sold more than three million copies around the world, and made him probably the best known Tibetan Buddhist teacher after the Dalai Lama, gave his annual teaching at his French centre Lerab Ling.

Sogyal’s organisation Rigpa – a Tibetan word meaning the essential nature of mind – has more than 100 centres in 40 countries around the world, but Lerab Ling, situated in rolling countryside in L’Hérault is the jewel in the crown. Boasting what is said to be the largest Tibetan Buddhist temple in the West, it was formally opened in 2008 by the Dalai Lama, with Carla Bruni Sarkozy, then France’s first lady, and a host of other dignitaries in attendance.

Sogyal is regarded by his students as a living embodiment of the Buddhist teachings of wisdom and compassion, but a man who teaches in a highly unorthodox way, known as ‘crazy wisdom’.

Sogyal 1

Sogyal Rinpoche

At Lerab Ling, more than 1000 students were gathered in the temple as he walked on stage, accompanied by his attendant, a Danish nun named Ani Chokyi. Sogyal, who is 70, is a portly, bespectacled man who requires a footstool to mount the throne from which he customarily teaches. Approaching the throne, he paused, then turned suddenly and punched the nun hard in the stomach.

‘I guess the footstool wasn’t in exactly the right position,’ says Gary Goldman, an American student of more than 20 years standing, who was seated in one of the front rows. ‘He had this flash of anger, and he just punched her – a short gut punch. It just stunned me. I thought, what the hell’s that about? Everybody around me kind of sucked their breath in. She started crying, and he told her to leave, get out, and then he started to talk.’

‘To see the master not as a human being but as the Buddha himself,’ Sogyal has often told his students, ‘is the source of the highest blessing.’ Those attending his teachings are cautioned not to be surprised or to draw ‘the wrong conclusions’ about the way he might behave. Apparently irrational, even violent conduct, it is said, should be viewed as ‘mere appearance’.

But punching a nun in the stomach… ‘Afterwards, everybody was trying to make sense of  what had happened,’ Goldman says. ‘People were very upset.’ It was customary for students at the retreat to email any thoughts or questions they might have on the day’s teachings to Sogyal’s senior instructors.

As a young man, Goldman was a US Army Ranger who served in Vietnam. ‘We all wrote something up,’ he says. ‘I said, I understood his methods were unconventional but punching Ani Chökyi was knocking the ball out of the park.

‘I’ve seen this kind of thing in the military and we don’t do that anymore – at least not legally. But on the other hand, if this was another part of his ‘crazy wisdom’ teaching, we seriously needed to talk about it…’

The next day, one of the Rigpa hierarchy addressed the doubters. Sogyal, he said, was upset that people should be questioning his methods. If people didn’t understand what had actually happened, then they probably weren’t ready for the promised higher-level teachings, and Sogyal would not teach again during the retreat.

‘This is what he does,’ Goldman says, ‘when something comes up  he’ll very skillfully manipulate his students to get them back in line. I just thought, I’m done with this…’

A catalogue of damning allegations

Largely thanks to the benign, smiling example of the Dalai Lama, Tibetan Buddhism has grown enormously in popularity in the West over the past thirty years, largely escaping the scandal that has dogged other religious institutions – at least publicly.

Within the Buddhist community, however, Sogyal Rinpoche has long been a controversial figure. For years, rumours have circulated on the internet about his behaviour, and in the 1990s a lawsuit alleging sexual and physical abuse was settled out of court.

Yet his position as one of the foremost Buddhist teachers in the West has remained remarkably intact – until now.  In July, eight senior and long-standing current and former students sent a 12-page letter to Sogyal. ‘Long simmering issues with your behaviour,’ it began, ‘can no longer be ignored or denied’, going on to list a catalogue of damning allegations against him.

TB 1

The Dalai Lama and Sogyal Rinpoche, talks with French Foreign Affairs minister Bernard Kouchner during the inauguration of the Buddhist Lerab Ling temple Credit: PASCAL GUYOT/AFP/Getty Images

Sogyal’s habitual physical abuse, the letter alleged, had ‘left monks, nuns, and lay people students of yours with bloody injuries and permanent scars.’  He had used his role as a teacher ‘to gain access to young women, and to coerce, intimidate and manipulate them into giving you sexual favours’. Students had been ordered to strip, ‘to show you our genitals’, ‘to give you oral sex,’ and ‘to have sex in your bed with our partners’.

Sogyal, it went on, had led a ‘lavish, gluttonous and sybaritic lifestyle’, which had been kept secret from the large body of his followers, and financed by donations by students ‘who believe their offering is being used to further wisdom and compassion in the world.’

‘If your striking and punching us and others, and having sex with your students and married women, and funding your sybaritic lifestyle with students’ donations is actually the ethical and compassionate behaviour of a Buddhist teacher, please explain to us how it is.’

Copied to the Dalai Lama, and Sogyal’s most senior students, the letter quickly went viral, shaking the foundation of Rigpa to the core. For Sogyal Rinpoche himself it was the prelude to the most spectacular fall from grace.

From Tibet to Cambridge

More than just a sordid story of an errant spiritual teacher, the case of Sogyal Rinpoche is a symptom of the perils that may arise when Westerners fall in thrall to esoteric spiritual teachings they may not fully understand, and when Eastern teachers are exposed to the glamour and temptations of celebrity worship.

Sogyal Lakar was born in Kham, in the east of Tibet, into a family of traders. Among his followers, he is believed to be the reincarnation of Sogyal Terton, a Tibetan lama who was a teacher of the 13th Dalai Lama (the present Dalai Lama is the 14th). But according to Rob Hogendoorn, a Dutch academic and Buddhist who has researched Sogyal’s background, the only authority for that claim appears to be Sogyal’s own mother. Sogyal had little formal Buddhist training, and it is notable that few in the Tibetan community have ever attended his teachings.

Sogyal_Richard_Gere_

Sogyal Rinpoche pictured with Buddhist teacher Joan Halifax and Richard Gere in Switzerland, 1985 Credit: Joan Halifax

“Approaching the throne, Sogyal Rinpoche paused, then turned suddenly and punched the nun hard in the stomach.”

When he was six months old, his mother put him in the care of her sister, Khandro Tsering Chodron, who was the young consort – or spiritual wife – of an eminent Tibetan lama, Jamyang Khyentse Chokyi Lodro, who became Sogyal’s effective guardian.

In 1954 the family fled from the invading Chinese army to Kalimpong in West Bengal, where Sogyal was educated at a Catholic primary school, St Augustine’s. Jamyang Khyentse died when Sogyal was around 10 or 11, and his education continued at an Anglican school, St Stephen’s College in Delhi. In 1971 he arrived at Trinity College Cambridge, taking a course in theological and religious studies, although he never graduated.

It was in Cambridge that he met Mary Finnigan, then a young Buddhist student, now an author and Sogyal’s fiercest critic, who has been assiduous in her chronicling of his alleged misdemeanours.

At that time there were only four Tibetan lamas living in Britain. ‘There was nobody teaching in London and there were no centres,’ Finnigan says. She arranged Sogyal’s first teachings, in the squat where she was living in London, and would remain his student until 1979.

Sogyal was an exotic presence; a Tibetan who could speak fluent English and seemed to know what he was talking about. His following rapidly grew, and with a £100,000 donation from a well-known English comedy actor he was able establish his first centre in London.

Assuming the honorific Rinpoche (it means ‘precious one’) Sogyal set himself up as a teacher in the Vajrayana, or tantric, tradition – a deeply esoteric aspect of Tibetan Buddhism, through which, it is believed, a student can unshackle the chains of ego and attain enlightenment in a single lifetime – ‘the helicopter to the top of the mountain’, as Sogyal has put it.

It involves the student giving total obedience to the lama in the belief that whatever the lama does, no matter how irrational or incomprehensible it may seem, is for the student’s benefit. Whatever doubts might arise in the mind of the student about these methods is due to ‘impure perception.’

sogyal in Germany

Sogyal Rinpoche in Germany in 2014 Credit: DPA picture alliance / Alamy Stock Photo

Tibetan Buddhist lore is filled with stories of great masters – or mahasiddhas – bringing their pupils to enlightenment by methods that appear to verge on madness. One of the most famous involves the 9th century mahasiddha Naropa, whose teacher Tilopa subjected him to a series of ordeals including leaping from the top of a temple and breaking his bones, jumping into fire and freezing water, and giving his wife to Tilopa as an offering.

According to these stories every time Naropa was broken or near death, Tilopa would heal him with the wave of a hand, giving him an instruction that would bring Naropa’s mind to a more advanced level.

Fundamental to this relationship between master and disciple is the bond of samaya, or trust, in which the pupil not only vows total obedience to the guru, but the guru vows to act only for the benefit of the pupil. Breaking samaya is held to have the most grave consequences, including banishment to ‘vajra hell’ and an infinity of unfortunate rebirths.

Wearing robes you have one arm bare, and he touched me there, as if I were sexual object. It made my skin crawl. I saw that the way he related to me could change completely

‘Once you enter into the hermetic world of Tibetan Buddhism, you somehow burn your bridges to Western rationality,’ says Stephen Batchelor, an English Buddhist teacher and academic who was himself a Tibetan Buddhist monk for eight years. ‘You enter a world that appears to be entirely consistent internally; everything makes sense; the structures of power seem to be in the service of these high ideals of enlightenment, and the relationship with the guru is the key element in your capacity to follow this path in the most effective way.’

But the Vajrayana is recognised as a particularly hazardous path, particularly to Western students without the deep grounding in Tibetan culture.

In characteristically light-hearted style, the Dalai Lama has spoken of his own caution in discussing the Vajrayana path. ‘I have to be careful what I say in teaching, as there are some seekers who might take the Naropa story literally and jump off a cliff, thinking the guru was hinting about it. Not only do I not have the ability to heal the broken body with a wave of my hand, but here in Dharamsala we don’t even have a proper ambulance service!’

The Dalai Lama has cautioned putative students that a good test of a teacher who is beyond attachments and the temptations of self-gratification is whether they can eat a piece of excrement with the same equanimity as a piece of food. Asked which Tibetan teachers were of a sufficiently high level of self-realisation to do this, he replied ‘Zero.’

A guru who drank like a fish

In 1976, Sogyal visited America to meet with another Tibetan lama, Chogyam Trungpa, who was regarded as the most extreme exemplar of ‘crazy wisdom’ teachings. Trungpa drank like a fish (he would die in 1987 from complications arising due to alcoholism), openly slept with his students and ran his organisation like a feudal court, surrounding himself with an elite bodyguard, sometimes amusing himself by dressing as a Grenadier guard. ‘The real function of the guru,’ he once said, ‘is to insult you.’ ‘Sogyal looked at what Trungpa had,’ says Mary Finnigan, ‘and said “That’s what I want.”’

Chogyam

Tibetan lama, Chogyam Trungpa, who was regarded as the most extreme exemplar of ‘crazy wisdom’ teachings Credit: rexfeatures

Like Trungpa, he adopted an unorthodox, often jokey, teaching style, but he was a compelling orator, with an ability to hold an audience in the palm of his hand and convey the Buddhist teachings in a clear and understandable way. ‘There are three kinds of people who show up for spiritual practice or information,’ Gary Goldman says.

‘You get the intellectuals who are curious and want to learn something about it; you get the people who are actively seeking truth, and looking to figure out what life and the world is about; and then you get the people who are totally psychologically f-d up; they’ve been abused; terrible things have happened to them. Sogyal was able to satisfy all three groups, very well and very compassionately.’

The book that made Sogyal a celebrity

In 1992 he published The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, a book that presented traditional Tibetan teachings on a happy life and good death for a Western audience. Clinicians, hospice workers and psychologists applauded it for the comfort it brought to the terminally ill. John Cleese, an early supporter, described it as ‘one of the most helpful books I have ever read.’

It was a runaway success. But quite how much Sogyal himself had to do with it is debatable; according to those close to the project, most of the work was done by ghost-writers – Sogyal’s closest student, and now his right-hand man, Patrick Gaffney, and the author Andrew Harvey.

The book made Sogyal a celebrity. He appeared in Bernardo Bertolucci’s film Little Buddha, and he travelled the world, establishing new centres. The combination of Sogyal’s charisma – a purveyor of ancient wisdom in touch with the modern world – and the mystique of Tibetan Buddhism proved a potent lure for new followers. Those signing up for his courses had little idea that, as one former follower puts it, Sogyal was ‘using meditation as a gateway drug into a cult of personality.’

But the first storm clouds were already gathering. Sogyal is not a monk, and there is theoretically no prohibition on him marrying or having sexual relations. But his sexual conduct was becoming a cause of increasing controversy in Buddhist circles – not least his surrounding himself with an effective harem of young women, whom Sogyal described as his ‘dakinis’ – a Tibetan term meaning spiritual muse.

In 1994, an American student using the legal pseudonym Janice Doe brought a suit against Sogyal, alleging that using the justification of his spiritual status he had sexually and physically abused her, turning her against her husband and family.

 

By sleeping with the teacher you get a closeness to him which everyone is hankering after

 

This, the charge alleged, was merely one example of a pattern of abuse against a number of women. The Telegraph Magazine published a cover story on the case in which two English women spoke about their own sexual encounters with Sogyal.

‘You’re chosen, which makes you feel special,’  said one woman. ‘Because he was my spiritual teacher I trusted that whatever he asked was in my best interests… You want to progress on the spiritual path, and by sleeping with the teacher you get a closeness to him which everyone is hankering after. I saw it as part of the teachings on the illusory nature of experience and emotions. But in fact it caused me a lot of pain that I wasn’t able to dissolve.’

Another spoke of her distress at discovering, shortly after he initiated a relationship with her, that Sogyal was also having sex with three other students. Sogyal, she said, had ‘used the teachings to attempt to keep me in a sexual relationship with him – one that I did not want to be in.’

Physical abuse and verbal humiliation

The Janice Doe case was settled quietly out of court. And in an age before the internet, most readers of The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying remained happily oblivious to any hint of scandal. Rather, the book was to prove a powerful medium in bringing him new followers.

Among them was a young Australian woman, who would later become a Buddhist nun, taking the name Drolma.

Drolma first read Sogyal’s book as a 21-year-old. ‘I thought that’s all very nice, but I don’t need this, and put it back on my bookshelf.’ Two years later, with her life ‘falling apart’ following an abortion and the break-up of a difficult relationship, she attended a retreat where Sogyal was teaching in New South Wales..

‘My life was at a point where I had no understanding of the suffering I was going through, and this provided some answers, and some practical steps, like meditation.’

lerab

The Lerab Ling temple in Roqueredonde, Hérault, in southern France Credit: PASCAL GUYOT/AFP/Getty Images

She became more involved in Rigpa, travelling to Lerab Ling for retreats and facilitating study groups. In 2002 she turned her back on a flourishing career as an artist to become a nun. ‘There was this aspect of devotion for the teacher that I felt very strongly. I felt it as the fire of the love of God. And I chose Buddhism because I felt I’d met an authentic example, someone I could follow.’

Even before taking monastic vows, she had witnessed an example of Sogyal’s ‘crazy wisdom’  when he publicly humiliated a male attendant during a teaching session. ‘He’d forgotten to put a full stop on the travel plans or something; Sogyal got him to kneel at the foot of the podium and then run backwards and forwards across the tent. And he did it with his tail between his legs. I felt terribly uncomfortable but I also thought he was very fortunate to have such close attention from the teacher.’

Sogyal made Drolma his personal assistant, handling his schedule. She would later become responsible for caring for his mother and aunt, Khandro, when they came to live at Lerab Ling. Her duties entailed maintaining a careful rapprochement with the inner-circle of Sogyal’s dakinis.

‘Their lives were incredibly pressurised,’ she says, ‘There was lots of jealousy, lots of secrets. If one of them was unhappy or in a mood, then all of us would feel the repercussions, so we also had to do our best to keep them supported.’

2 lamas.jpg

Sogyal Rinpoche and Lama Yonten conduct a ceremony at the opening of the Sukhavati Spiritual Care Center in Bad Saarow, Germany, May 2016  Credit: Alamy

The first time Sogyal hit her hard on the head with the backscratcher that he carries everywhere, Drolma says, she accepted it as part of his ‘wrathful’ training. ‘I thought, wow, he really trusts me…’

It was the beginning of years of physical abuse and verbal humiliation. ‘If he became anxious about his mother, or over a relationship with a girlfriend or some financial thing, he would slap me across the face, or hit me over the head with his backscratcher.’ On one occasion he pulled her by the ear so violently hard that it drew blood.

The first time he punched her in the stomach was in the ante-room of the temple at Lerab Ling, where Drolma was preparing his ritual objects prior to an important ceremony for a visiting lama and his retinue of monks.

 

Like Trungpa, he adopted an unorthodox, often jokey, teaching style, but he was a compelling orator, with an ability to hold an audience in the palm of his hand and convey the Buddhist teachings in a clear and understandable way

‘He got out of the car, furious for some reason, slammed the door and just punched me. Then he got dressed in his robes and we went in. I was walking behind him in tears, feeling completely humiliated, with these Tibetan monks there, thinking “Flakey Western nun…”’

Such incidents of violence and abuse were common for those closest to Sogyal, explained away by senior instructors within Rigpa as the lama employing ‘skillful methods’.

‘There was definitely a very well thought-out structure within the Rigpa system that would block the perception of abuse, either by using those historical stories, or making you feel really special if this was the attention you were getting,’ Drolma says. ‘People would say “please train me, Rinpoche.”’

The Telegraph has been given numerous accounts of similar abuse meted out to Sogyal’s closest students: a woman being beaten violently around the head with a backscratcher. A man being kicked, punched in the face, pinned against the wall by Sogyal with his hands around his throat, and hit so hard on the head with a hardbound practice book that he fell to the floor.

‘One goes back to one’s room at the end of a day of it, thinking what the hell was that about, but still hanging on to the trust that this is part and parcel of the purification of negative karma,’ said one man, who was a student for 20 years.

 

 

The thought of reporting Sogyal to the police, he said, never crossed his mind. ‘These are criminal acts. But the problem is we’ve been complicit, we’ve allowed it, and he keeps doing it.’

In this environment, everything would be rationalised and accepted as ‘a teaching’. Several people told the Telegraph how Sogyal would sometimes address his closest students while defecating – like a Tudor monarch, ordering his ‘dakinis’ to perform the appropriate ablutions as a demonstration of ‘service’.

The analogy with a monarch is not misplaced. It is further alleged that among his inner circle, Sogyal frequently practiced a sort of droit de seigneur, taking the wives or girlfriends of his most loyal male followers as his sexual partners, either openly or covertly. Men were expected to accept this is as part of the teaching. When one complained, Sogyal told his partner the man was ‘possessed by demons’. The eight-signatory letter further alleges that on at least one occasion, Sogyal had offered one of his female attendants to another lama for sex.

For a woman to be chosen by Sogyal as a sexual partner was regarded as ‘an honour,’ Drolma says. ‘It meant they had dakini qualities, and you’re said to be prolonging the life of the master.’

Travel, excess spending and ‘a modest life’

The offerings expected from followers maintained Sogyal in a lifestyle of profligate extravagance. At Lerab Ling, he lived in a chalet, decorated with cedar wood panels, which overlooked his own heated swimming pool. There was a giant television on which he enjoyed watching his favourite American action movies. In the ‘lama kitchen’ attendants were available day and night to provide his favourite dishes at a moment’s notice.

Attendants and his inner circle were worked to a point of physical exhaustion serving him. In the months that Sogyal was at Lerab Ling, or whenever she travelled with him, Drolma worked 14 hour days, six days a week. ‘It was always about survival and addressing his most immediate needs for fear of the repercussions if you didn’t.’

On foreign trips, he travelled first class, his retinue with him. Oane Bijlsma, a Dutch woman who joined Rigpa in 2011 going on to become one of Sogyal’s attendants, describes how for an Easter teaching in Britain in 2012, Rigpa took over Haileybury, the public school in Hertfordshire. Sogyal was installed in the music teacher’s house.

bruni

The Dalai Lama and Carla Bruni-Sarkozy with Sogyal Rinpoche, at the inauguration of Lerab Ling temple, 2008 Credit: Getty images 

On his instruction, his students carefully photographed each room, then moved every stick of furniture into storage, replacing it with furnishings more suited to Sogyal’s tastes, including a large flat-screen tv with satellite connection. At the end of the six day teaching, the rooms were restored to their original state. Oane, who was in charge of provisions, was instructed to visit local butchers, taking photographs of the best joints of meat, which she had to submit for Sogyal’s approval, before buying them.

‘I was shopping for groceries with hundreds of pounds in my pocket in cash. I was buying ridiculous amounts of the best meats I could get. And the wine and the roses and the chocolates… And then people in the inner-circle would be on stage at the teachings talking about Sogyal living a modest life, and keeping nothing for himself. It was totally obscene.’

‘In Tibet a lama would have been under much more control,’ one former follower told me. ‘The system would have curbed his excesses. But Sogyal has been surrounded by Western followers who believe that everything he says and does is perfect. It’s a disaster for him, and a disaster for everybody else. He completely lost touch with reality.’

Reaching saturation point

For some within Rigpa, the paradox between being beaten and abused while being told it was for their benefit was causing predictable problems. ‘It creates split personalities in people,’ one student told told me. ‘People feel a loyalty to the teachings which is constantly being contradicted by Sogyal’s behaviour; their hearts are split in two.’

In 2007, Sogyal introduced a programme that he called ‘Rigpa Therapy’, in which a number of qualified psychotherapists, who were also Rigpa students, were assigned to treat those entertaining doubts about the teachings. Drolma was among them.

‘The crux of every session,’ she says, ‘was exploring how what Sogyal did related to other past relationships in my life. It was all about that, and how my difficulties were nothing to do with Sogyal, and how his blessing was letting me go back to that time and work through it. Basically, the therapists had been been brought in to stop people leaving.’

If he became anxious about his mother, or over a relationship with a girlfriend or some financial thing, he would slap me across the face, or hit me over the head with his backscratcher

At around the same time, Drolma appeared in a German film about Sogyal, Ancient Wisdom For the Modern World, discussing her relationship with him. ‘Sometimes he’ll be like my father, like my mother, like my boss, like my friend – like my enemy, because he pushes my buttons,’ she said. ‘But I know always his heart and his motivation is so pure.

‘He’s always showing me who I am and who I’m not. The buttons he presses are not who I truly am. The buttons he presses are what needs to be removed. Sometimes there’s a joy when they’re pressed, because it’s showing what needs to be peeled away. Whenever there’s any pain that’s not the real me hurting; that’s the ego that Rinpoche is trying to eradicate.’

Senior instructors congratulated her on her appearance. But her doubts were hardening. ‘I’d reached saturation point.’ She confided her feelings to a visiting Spanish nun. ‘I’d always been trained to keep everything secret from anyone outside; but I ended up telling her everything. She said, “that’s straight out abuse. You’ve got to leave.”’

 

Sogyal 2

Sogyal Rinpoche Credit: Getty Images

In 2010 she travelled to Taiwan with three other nuns from Lerab Ling for monastic training. She returned to France, but not to Lerab Ling, hiding out in Paris, ignoring Sogyal’s telephone calls, ‘ranging from “Dear Drolma, I love you, we can talk about this”, to “where the f-k are you and you’re making me really angry, and you’d better come back otherwise you’re going to hell…”’

She fled to India, living in a nunnery, before finally going home to Australia. In 2011, she summoned her nerve to go back to Lerab Ling, for the cremation of Sogyal’s aunt, Khandro. ‘It was the hardest thing I’ve ever done,’ she says. ‘I was in nun’s robes and still keeping my precepts.

‘Wearing robes you have one arm bare, and he touched me there, as if I were sexual object. It made my skin crawl. I saw that the way he related to me could change completely.’ The cremation over, she returned to Australia, and gave up her robes.

‘Looking back,’ she says, ‘I think I’d lost all faculty of being able to discern clearly what was going on. He absolutely ground me down. I’m generally someone that’s very trusting of people. And he really took advantage of that.

‘And I felt ashamed to leave my friends, ashamed to go back to my family and say I’d made a mistake.’ She pauses. ‘There’s so much shame in all of this.’

Secrecy, denial and further allegations

Within Rigpa, a culture of secrecy and denial prevailed among Sogyal’s inner circle, the worst excesses of his behaviour kept hidden from the thousands of more casual followers who would attend retreats and teachings.

‘It’s like an incestuous family, where you keep the secret in the family,’ one woman who claims she was sexually abused by Sogyal told me. But, inevitably, allegations of impropriety began to leak out on the internet.

In 2011 Mary Finnigan, the English author and former student, published a document Behind The Thankas, charting Sogyal’s history of alleged sexual abuse, and claiming that there was a sub-sect within Rigpa known as Lama Care, set up specifically to make sure that women were available for sex with him wherever he travelled, and that ‘dakinis’ had been pressurised against their will to take part in orgies.

 

Tibetan culture is such that it will never criticise another lama, especially one within your own groupStephen Batchelor

In the same year, a Canadian documentary called In The Name of Enlightenment was broadcast with more allegations of sexual abuse by former devotees.’

In 2015 the President of Rigpa France, Olivier Raurich, resigned, explaining in an interview to the French magazine Marianne that ‘I had come for teachings on humility, love, truth, and trust, and I found myself in a quasi-Stalinist environment and permanent double-talk’. Sogyal, he said, ‘did not hesitate to brutally silence and ridicule people in meetings. Critical thinking is prohibited around him. Negative feedback never reaches him – only praise is reported because people in the close circle are afraid of him.’

Within Rigpa, students were allegedly instructed to kneel before Sogyal and swear they would not listen to Raurich’s accusations. He was denounced as an opportunist who was simply seeking publicity for his own career as a meditation teacher.

The following year, a French academic Marion Dapsance published a book, Les Dévots du Bouddhisme, containing further allegations of abuse, and the ‘cult-like’ behaviour of Sogyal’s inner circle.

A response posted on the Lerab Ling website described her portrayal as ‘extremely prejudiced’ and ‘unrecognizable’, invoking the Tibetan teaching of training the mind in compassion, called lojong, with its core principle of ‘give all profit and gain to others. Take all loss and defeat upon yourself.’

In this context, the letter went on, Sogyal, following the example of ‘great saints of the past’ would never respond to such allegations.

s3

Sogyal Rinpoche visits Paris Credit: Getty Images

Ignoring the scandal altogether, in November 2016, Patrick Gaffney instead wrote to members of Rigpa, explaining that another lama, and close friend of Sogyal’s, Orgyen Tobgyal Rinpoche, believing that the next few years represented ‘a critical period in [Sogyal’s] life’ had consulted ‘a unique clairvoyant master’ in Tibet for advice on what should be done to avert ‘any obstacles to Rinpoche’s life, health and work.’

The ‘clairvoyant lama’ had recommended a number of different ritual practices to remove these obstacles. The most important was for Sogyal’s followers to ‘repair any impairments of the samaya’ – their vow of trust between guru and student – by embarking on an intensive practice of reciting mantras. The goal, Gaffney wrote, was to accumulate 100 million 100 syllable mantras every year – a practice that would require 3,000 students chanting for 40 minutes a day.

‘If the practices he recommends are done,’ Gaffney went on, ‘then there is every chance that Rinpoche will live until at least the age of eighty-five.’

Some saw it as a subtle way of dampening the growing scandal, and coercing doubting students back in line. ‘It was shifting the responsibility for the consequences of Sogyal’s actions onto the students,’ one former student told me. ‘To turn your back on the guru is the worst thing you can do. No-one wants to go to Vajra hell.’

Sogyal’s open response

In July, as the eight-signatory letter spread like wildfire, Sogyal wrote an open response to members of Rigpa. He had spent his whole life, he wrote, ‘trying my best’ to serve the Buddha’ teachings, ‘and not a day goes by when I am not thinking about the welfare of my students.’ But in light of the controversy, and following the advice from his own masters about the obstacles arising for his health and life in general, he now intended to enter into retreat ‘as soon as possible.’

He would also, he went on, ‘pray and practice for healing and understanding to prevail, and in the spirit of the great…masters of the past, take the suffering upon myself and give happiness and love to others.’

Through all the years of rumours and revelations about Sogyal’s behaviour, one group maintained a conspicuous silence. His fellow Tibetan lamas. Sogyal’s large following and considerable wealth made him a powerful figure within the Tibetan Buddhist community. Over the years he has been generous in his donations to monasteries in Nepal and India, and other lamas have frequently given teachings at Lerab Ling, their visits lending authority to Sogyal’s credentials.

‘Tibetan culture is such that it will never criticise another lama, especially one within your own group,’ Stephen Batchelor says. ‘But the root of the problem lies in the tantric, aristocratic structure of old Tibetan society that they are seeking to preserve in exile. They’re in the business of holding on to their traditions, not reforming them.

‘The problem facing other lamas is that if they accept these criticisms they are basically accepting criticism of the whole system that in a way underpins their own authority; and if they say nothing they know they will be perceived as turning a blind eye to what looks, quite blatantly, like abusive behaviour.

‘It’s a terrible thing if this discredits Tibetan Buddhism, because Vajrayana is a very rich part of Buddhist heritage. But at the same time these abuses have to be addressed.  And the Tibetan tradition has to come to terms with that.’

 

GettyImages-113371065_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bq_MBhvjUqhIfRd2_dxg_gJ-yEA__MmDc0hQxjdbkS2u8

Carla Bruni-Sarkozy And The Dalai Lama Inaugurate The Lerab Ling Temple On August 22, 2008  Credit: Getty Images

The Dalai Lama has frequently condemned unethical behaviour among Buddhist teachers, and urged students to speak out against it – ‘through the newspaper, through the radio. Make public’ – while never specifically commenting on Sogyal by name. But last month, speaking in Ladakh, he talked of the need to reform the ‘influence of the feudal system’ in Tibetan institutions.  Followers, he said, ‘must not say, “this is my guru, whatever my guru says I must follow.” That’s totally wrong.’ If a teacher is behaving unethically there was a duty to make their behaviour public.

‘Now recently,’ he went on, ‘Sogyal Rinpoche, my very good friend, but he is disgraced….’

To the outsider it might have seemed a fleetingly incidental reference; to the Buddhist community it was tantamount to excommunication.

Just a few days after the Dalai Lama’s speech, Sogyal announced that he was ‘retiring’ as spiritual director of Rigpa, citing the ‘turbulence’ the allegations around him had caused. There was no acknowledgment of abuse, and no expression of apology or regret.

While no longer spiritual director, he said, he would continue as their teacher. ‘Please understand that I am not and never will abandon you! I have a solemn commitment to help bring you to enlightenment and I will never renege on that!’

 

Everybody wants to be happy in life. So you join an organisation; you feel good, people are nice, you start to participate more; you invest a lot of time, perhaps a lot of money

The Telegraph magazine contacted Rigpa with a detailed list of the allegations contained in this article, asking for a response. The organisation replied saying they had no comment to make on the allegations. Instead, they referred The Telegraph to the press release announcing Sogyal’s retirement as spiritual director.

Having sought ‘professional and spiritual advice’, that statement went on, Rigpa would be setting up an investigation by ‘a neutral third party’  into the various allegations; launching a consultation process to establish ‘a code of conduct and ‘grievance process’ for Rigpa members; and establishing a new ‘spiritual advisory group’ to guide the organisation.

Rigpa declined to specify what form this independent investigation will take, and also whom the ‘spiritual advisory group’ is likely to be comprised of, saying only that ‘independent professionals will be engaged to lead the internal investigation and this will probably commence mid-autumn.’

Sogyal’s last public appearance was on July 30, in Thailand, speaking at the Seventh World Youth Buddhist Symposium. His speech, on the subject of meditation and peace of mind, made no mention of the scandal that had engulfed him. ‘If your mind is relaxed and at ease,’ he told his young audience, ‘no matter what crises you are facing you will not be disturbed. Even when difficulties come you will be able to turn them to your own advantage.’

Quite how he could that now do that is open to question. Following submissions from former Rigpa members, The Charity Commission has opened a case on The Rigpa Fellowship to assess whether a full investigation into the affairs and governance of Sogyal’s organisation is required. At the same time former students are exploring pressing criminal charges.

Recognising ‘this is abuse’

One leaves a spiritual organisation, Drolma says, with a mixture of feelings – relief, shame, guilt for those left behind.

‘I haven’t turned my back on the Buddhist teachings,’ she says, ‘but it was important to let people know what was going on. Sogyal is an abuser, he’s delusional, and he has created real, deep harm for people, and that’s not right in any place at all.’

‘It’s like the Buddha said,’ Gary Goldman says, ‘everybody wants to be happy in life. So you join an organisation; you feel good, people are nice, you start to participate more; you invest a lot of time, perhaps a lot of money. At some point it becomes interwoven into your psyche. It’s a part of who you are. And to give that up is incredibly difficult and painful. I saw [Sogyal] as a friend, and on some level I still admire him as an accomplished teacher; but he’s lost his way, and it’s very sad.

‘Right now, I’m very unhappy. There’s a hole in my heart. But a lot of people just can’t give it up; they’re tied to him; they’d be giving up an authority figure, probably a father figure; psychologically, it would be a huge loss.’

 

bruni sog

Carla Bruni-Sarkozy with Sogyal at the opening of the Lerab Ling Temple On August 22, 2008 Credit: Getty Images

In July, as the furore over the damning letter from the eight students gathered pace, stories circulated on Buddhist sites of the incident in 2016 when the nun, Ane Chokyi, was punched in the stomach. In response, Ani Chokyi posted a reply on a closed Facebook page, saying that Sogyal’s teachings at the retreat had been ‘loving beyond any ordinary description,’ and the punch to the stomach was ‘taken out of a greater context.

‘I have agreed to the skillful means of my master to purify and transform my delusions into clarity and uproot my attachments,’ she wrote. ‘Sometimes these means can be wrathful and not always a pleasant experience, but that is what I need to be able to see through all the layers of ignorance that keep me blinded and stuck.’ Sogyal, she went on, ‘was definitely not in a fit of rage, there was just a single moment of wrath, which manifested in a soft punch, but it was neither violent or abusive, at least not to my feelings.’

Drolma posted a reply. She could understand Ani Chokyi’s perspective completely, she wrote, because that was how she had once justified Sogyal’s behaviour to herself. ‘If the student getting this kind of “special training” has a history of abuse in other relationships in their life (as seems to be the case of many of us, including myself), then it is so much more natural, even comforting to receive wrathful attention from someone who is also telling us they love us deeply.’

But then, she wrote, ‘just like the flick of a switch, I recognised that “this is abuse”. And with that, I started to reflect on all the ways in which I had allowed it to happen. It was like in The Wizard of Oz, when the curtain is finally pulled back and you realise there is no “all-mighty Oz”, there is just a little man shouting into a microphone…’

A history of abuse allegations Sogyal Rinpoche

http://howdidithappen.org/history-abuse-allegations-rigpa/

 

  • November 1994

    A $10 million civil lawsuit was filed against Sogyal Rinpoche and Rigpa by an anonymous plaintiff, who was given the name “Janice Doe” to protect her identity. The complaint alleged infliction of emotional distress, breach of fiduciary duty, and assault and battery.

     

     

  • 1995

    Mick Brown’s 1995 article in the Telegraph Magazine, called “The Precious One,” looked at the abuse allegations against Sogyal Rinpoche and shared anonymous allegations of sexual abuse from two additional women.

     

 

  • 2011

    The Canadian company Cogent/Benger produced a television documentary with new allegations of abuse against Sogyal Rinopche called “In the Name of Enlightenment.” It aired on Vision TV in Canada.

     

  • 2016

    Senior student, instructor, translator, and former director of Rigpa France, Olivier Raurich, left Rigpa in 2016. In an interview in the French magazine “Marianne,” Raurich spoke of secrecy in the Rigpa organization, manipulation of information, and rumors of sexual abuse. He said Sogyal Rinpoche’s dictatorial side and anger worsened after a 2011 exposé in “Marianne.” He also claimed that Sogyal Rinpoche brutally silences and ridicules people.

     

  • August 2016

    Sogyal Rinpoche hit a nun in the stomach in front of 1,000 students during a teaching session at his retreat center, Lerab Ling. More than a year later, following abuse allegations made by eight long-time students, which mentioned the incident, she issued a statement describing what happened as a soft punch. She says it was not abuse because she had agreed to let her teacher work with her in this way, and that it helped her move through a blockage.

    However, several students sitting within a few feet of the incident perceived it differently. They heard the wind knocked out of her, saw her immediately double over, and witnessed her running off the stage in tears. They felt deeply disturbed by the incident.

    Some of them sent letters of complaint to Sogyal Rinpoche via his feedback system. He responded in the teaching the next day by saying anyone questioning his teaching methods was probably not ready to receive the Dzogchen teachings.

     

  • June 2017

    The Dutch current affairs program “Brandpunt” featured the testimony of former Rigpa student, Oane Bijlsma, in a program called Abuse in the Buddhist Community: This Victim Tells Her Story for the First Time.

    Bujlsma made claims of abuse of power and sexual intimidation by Sogyal Rinpoche. Although Oane was not abused herself, she experienced sexual harassment and she said she witnessed other women being abused, intimidated, and exploited.

     

  • July 2017

    A 12-page letter signed by current and ex-members of Rigpa details abuse allegedly committed by Sogyal Rinpoche. It was sent to Sogyal Rinpoche, a small selection of his peers, and his closest students.

 

16 Responses

  1. […] Mick Brown: 23 September 2017  “At Lerab Ling, more than 1000 students were gathered in the temple as he walked on stage, accompanied by his attendant, a Danish nun named Ani Chokyi. Sogyal, who is 70, is a portly, bespectacled man who requires a footstool to mount the throne from which he customarily teaches. Approaching the throne, he paused, then turned suddenly and punched the nun hard in the stomach. ‘I guess the footstool wasn’t in exactly the right position,’ says Gary Goldman, an American student of more than 20 years standing, who was seated in one of the front rows. ‘He had this flash of anger, and he just punched her – a short gut punch. It just stunned me. I thought, what the hell’s that about? Everybody around me kind of sucked their breath in. She started crying, and he told her to leave, get out, and then he started to talk.’ (…)Goldman says. ‘People were very upset.’ (…)As a young man, Goldman was a US Army Ranger who served in Vietnam. ‘We all wrote something up,’ he says. ‘I said, I understood his methods were unconventional but punching Ani Chökyi was knocking the ball out of the park. ‘I’ve seen this kind of thing in the military and we don’t do that anymore – at least not legally. (…)The next day, one of the Rigpa hierarchy addressed the doubters. Sogyal, he said, was upset that people should be questioning his methods. If people didn’t understand what had actually happened, then they probably weren’t ready for the promised higher-level teachings, and Sogyal would not teach again during the retreat. ‘This is what he does,’ Goldman says, ‘when something comes up  he’ll very skillfully manipulate his students to get them back in line. I just thought, I’m done with this…’ (…)More than just a sordid story of an errant spiritual teacher, the case of Sogyal Rinpoche is a symptom of the perils that may arise when Westerners fall in thrall to esoteric spiritual teachings they may not fully understand, and when Eastern teachers are exposed to the glamour and temptations of celebrity worship. (…)Sogyal Lakar was born in Kham, in the east of Tibet, into a family of traders. Among his followers, he is believed to be the reincarnation of Sogyal Terton, a Tibetan lama who was a teacher of the 13th Dalai Lama (the present Dalai Lama is the 14th). But according to Rob Hogendoorn, a Dutch academic and Buddhist who has researched Sogyal’s background, the only authority for that claim appears to be Sogyal’s own mother. Sogyal had little formal Buddhist training, and it is notable that few in the Tibetan community have ever attended his teachings. When he was six months old, his mother put him in the care of her sister, Khandro Tsering Chodron, who was the young consort – or spiritual wife – of an eminent Tibetan lama, Jamyang Khyentse Chokyi Lodro, who became Sogyal’s effective guardian. In 1954 the family fled from the invading Chinese army to Kalimpong in West Bengal, where Sogyal was educated at a Catholic primary school, St Augustine’s. Jamyang Khyentse died when Sogyal was around 10 or 11, and his education continued at an Anglican schoo […]

    Like

  2. […] Mick Brown: 23 September 2017  “At Lerab Ling, more than 1000 students were gathered in the temple as he walked on stage, accompanied by his attendant, a Danish nun named Ani Chokyi. Sogyal, who is 70, is a portly, bespectacled man who requires a footstool to mount the throne from which he customarily teaches. Approaching the throne, he paused, then turned suddenly and punched the nun hard in the stomach. ‘I guess the footstool wasn’t in exactly the right position,’ says Gary Goldman, an American student of more than 20 years standing, who was seated in one of the front rows. ‘He had this flash of anger, and he just punched her – a short gut punch. It just stunned me. I thought, what the hell’s that about? Everybody around me kind of sucked their breath in. She started crying, and he told her to leave, get out, and then he started to talk.’ (…)Goldman says. ‘People were very upset.’ (…)As a young man, Goldman was a US Army Ranger who served in Vietnam. ‘We all wrote something up,’ he says. ‘I said, I understood his methods were unconventional but punching Ani Chökyi was knocking the ball out of the park. ‘I’ve seen this kind of thing in the military and we don’t do that anymore – at least not legally. (…)The next day, one of the Rigpa hierarchy addressed the doubters. Sogyal, he said, was upset that people should be questioning his methods. If people didn’t understand what had actually happened, then they probably weren’t ready for the promised higher-level teachings, and Sogyal would not teach again during the retreat. ‘This is what he does,’ Goldman says, ‘when something comes up  he’ll very skillfully manipulate his students to get them back in line. I just thought, I’m done with this…’ (…)More than just a sordid story of an errant spiritual teacher, the case of Sogyal Rinpoche is a symptom of the perils that may arise when Westerners fall in thrall to esoteric spiritual teachings they may not fully understand, and when Eastern teachers are exposed to the glamour and temptations of celebrity worship. (…)Sogyal Lakar was born in Kham, in the east of Tibet, into a family of traders. Among his followers, he is believed to be the reincarnation of Sogyal Terton, a Tibetan lama who was a teacher of the 13th Dalai Lama (the present Dalai Lama is the 14th). But according to Rob Hogendoorn, a Dutch academic and Buddhist who has researched Sogyal’s background, the only authority for that claim appears to be Sogyal’s own mother. Sogyal had little formal Buddhist training, and it is notable that few in the Tibetan community have ever attended his teachings. When he was six months old, his mother put him in the care of her sister, Khandro Tsering Chodron, who was the young consort – or spiritual wife – of an eminent Tibetan lama, Jamyang Khyentse Chokyi Lodro, who became Sogyal’s effective guardian. In 1954 the family fled from the invading Chinese army to Kalimpong in West Bengal, where Sogyal was educated at a Catholic primary school, St Augustine’s. Jamyang Khyentse died when Sogyal was around 10 or 11, and his education continued at an Anglican school, St Stephen’s College in Delhi. In 1971 he arrived at Trinity College Cambridge, taking a course in theological and religious studies, although he never graduated. (…)In 1976, Sogyal visited America to meet with another Tibetan lama, Chogyam Trungpa, who was regarded as the most extreme exemplar of ‘crazy wisdom’ teachings. Trungpa drank like a fish (he would die in 1987 from complications arising due to alcoholism), openly slept with his students and ran his organisation like a feudal court, surrounding himself with an elite bodyguard, sometimes amusing himself by dressing as a Grenadier guard. ‘The real function of the guru,’ he once said, ‘is to insult you.’ ‘Sogyal looked at what Trungpa had,’ says Mary Finnigan, ‘and said “That’s what I want.”’ (…)incidents of violence and abuse were common for those closest to Sogyal, explained away by senior instructors within Rigpa as the lama employing ‘skillful methods’. ‘There was definitely a very well thought-out structure within the Rigpa system that would block the perception of abuse, either by using those historical stories, or making you feel really special if this was the attention you were getting,’ Drolma says. (…) The Telegraph has been given numerous accounts of similar abuse meted out to Sogyal’s closest students: a woman being beaten violentl […]

    Like

  3. […] Mick Brown: 23 September 2017  “At Lerab Ling, more than 1000 students were gathered in the temple as he walked on stage, accompanied by his attendant, a Danish nun named Ani Chokyi. Sogyal, who is 70, is a portly, bespectacled man who requires a footstool to mount the throne from which he customarily teaches. Approaching the throne, he paused, then turned suddenly and punched the nun hard in the stomach. ‘I guess the footstool wasn’t in exactly the right position,’ says Gary Goldman, an American student of more than 20 years standing, who was seated in one of the front rows. ‘He had this flash of anger, and he just punched her – a short gut punch. It just stunned me. I thought, what the hell’s that about? Everybody around me kind of sucked their breath in. She started crying, and he told her to leave, get out, and then he started to talk.’ (…)Goldman says. ‘People were very upset.’ (…)As a young man, Goldman was a US Army Ranger who served in Vietnam. ‘We all wrote something up,’ he says. ‘I said, I understood his methods were unconventional but punching Ani Chökyi was knocking the ball out of the park. ‘I’ve seen this kind of thing in the military and we don’t do that anymore – at least not legally. (…)The next day, one of the Rigpa hierarchy addressed the doubters. Sogyal, he said, was upset that people should be questioning his methods. If people didn’t understand what had actually happened, then they probably weren’t ready for the promised higher-level teachings, and Sogyal would not teach again during the retreat. ‘This is what he does,’ Goldman says, ‘when something comes up  he’ll very skillfully manipulate his students to get them back in line. I just thought, I’m done with this…’ (…)More than just a sordid story of an errant spiritual teacher, the case of Sogyal Rinpoche is a symptom of the perils that may arise when Westerners fall in thrall to esoteric spiritual teachings they may not fully understand, and when Eastern teachers are exposed to the glamour and temptations of celebrity worship. (…)Sogyal Lakar was born in Kham, in the east of Tibet, into a family of traders. Among his followers, he is believed to be the reincarnation of Sogyal Terton, a Tibetan lama who was a teacher of the 13th Dalai Lama (the present Dalai Lama is the 14th). But according to Rob Hogendoorn, a Dutch academic and Buddhist who has researched Sogyal’s background, the only authority for that claim appears to be Sogyal’s own mother. Sogyal had little formal Buddhist training, and it is notable that few in the Tibetan community have ever attended his teachings. When he was six months old, his mother put him in the care of her sister, Khandro Tsering Chodron, who was the young consort – or spiritual wife – of an eminent Tibetan lama, Jamyang Khyentse Chokyi Lodro, who became Sogyal’s effective guardian. In 1954 the family fled from the invading Chinese army to Kalimpong in West Bengal, where Sogyal was educated at a Catholic primary school, St Augustine’s. Jamyang Khyentse died when Sogyal was around 10 or 11, and his education continued at an Anglican school, St Stephen’s College in Delhi. In 1971 he arrived at Trinity College Cambridge, taking a course in theological and religious studies, although he never graduated. (…)In 1976, Sogyal visited America to meet with another Tibetan lama, Chogyam Trungpa, who was regarded as the most extreme exemplar of ‘crazy wisdom’ teachings. Trungpa drank like a fish (he would die in 1987 from complications arising due to alcoholism), openly slept with his students and ran his organisation like a feudal court, surrounding himself with an elite bodyguard, sometimes amusing himself by dressing as a Grenadier guard. ‘The real function of the guru,’ he once said, ‘is to insult you.’ ‘Sogyal looked at what Trungpa had,’ says Mary Finnigan, ‘and said “That’s what I want.”’ (…)incidents of violence and abuse were common for those closest to Sogyal, explained away by senior instructors within Rigpa as the lama employing ‘skillful methods’. ‘There was definitely a very well thought-out structure within the Rigpa system that would block the perception of abuse, either by using those historical stories, or making you feel really special if this was the attention you were getting,’ Drolma says. (…) The Telegraph has been given numerous accounts of similar abuse meted out to Sogyal’s closest students: a woman being beaten violently around the head with a backscratcher. A man being kicked, punched in the face, pinned against the wall by Sogyal with his hands arou […]

    Like

  4. My latest attempt to get through to the Higher-Ups at Rigpa Org International – namely Mr Patrick Gaffney – right-hand man of Sogyal since the seventies – https://savetheholyheadland.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/calling-patrick-gaffney-rigpa-org-now-hear-this-.html

    Like

  5. So much about the Dalai Lama’s usual lies about “Sogyal being disgraced in America.”

    No one is reporting on Sogyal in America. Here is his USA Rigpa site, carrying on as usual, since no one in the United States has read about Lama Sogyal in any newspaper here in the States. The New York Times is busy reporting on Scientology, too, instead. That is so Sogyal’s Dalai Lama Tenzin Gyatso Institute can train more abusive lamas, here in the United States, to confuse every State of the Union, like California, who wants us all to become the United States of India.

    Here is the proof that the Dalai Lama lies:

    http://usa.rigpa.org/

    Rigpa is alive and well in the United States. It’s as though nothing at all happened, and history doesn’t exist. Exactly what Mindfulness eventually teaches others to believe. Sogyal’s Rigpa Centers’ pristine status here in the United States is proof of how successful their damage control vehicle was. At least so far. Its been six months by now that the news was all over Europe and Britain.

    The WHAT NOW blog site even seduced established western journalists to ‘go along with the ruse and the ride’ writing articles and, by so doing, joined the Buddhist Establishment Swamp, over at Trungpa’s “Lion’s Roar” formerly the Shambhala Sun, and the Communist Karmapa’s flagship magazine, “Buddhadharma,” who have now joined forces to really dumb people down, and all at a time when the sexual abuse of Hollywood and journalists and liberal celebrities of PBS, who have been promoting these Tantric lamas and their sexual abuses and misogyny for decades, are all over the news? Was this Hollywood exposure just another false flag to protect the real reason there is so much abuse in Hollywood and the entertainment industry: Tibetan Tantric Lamaism?

    I am beginning to suspect that all these academics, journalists and third-world feminists Tantric practitioners, an oxymoron if ever there was, who are claiming to be addressing the sexual abuse of Lama Sogyal, are all doing mindfulness meditation themselves by now, and so can ignore the Elephant in the room: They don’t want to judge the institutionalized Tibetan Tantric sexual abuse and practices that make these lamas predatory in the first place, and that created a Lama Sogyal .

    So good luck Ireland. Scientology is a distraction, from the mother lode cult in your midst. You are being targeted. Just like the United States of America was, for the last forty years. Get ready to become a nation of third wave feminists ,the new ‘spiritualized feminists’ that think a sexual remark is worse than rape and sexual abuse.

    Like

  6. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
    The latest post from WHAT NOW,( more than likely a blog designed and controlled by Tenpel of Stasi fame) the Dalai Lama’s secret weapon to keep Tibetan Buddhism’s a.k.a. Lamaism’s institutionalized and religiously justified misogyny and abuse from reaching the public, shows that the Tibetan Buddhist Establishment Swamp is active and well and helped along by the many enablers, unwitting and otherwise: the journalists, academics, western monks and nuns, the still-cult-controlled TB devotees and the now Zen Buddhists, all on board the Three Stream Buddhocracy movement, to bring their ‘secular spirituality’ to the world. We know that their billion-dollar mindfulness commodity cannot be harmed. So no criminal procedures for assault and gross sexual abuse will be taken against the Dalai Lama’s best friend and benefactor, Lama Sogyal of Lakar. He is probably somewhere continuing his sybaritic life-style, surrounded by his western female harem, as the Tibetan Buddhist sexual enabling team, breathes a sigh of relief. Job well done! They all say amongst themselves.
    Now the Zen Buddhist Olive Branch group, composed of Zen Buddhists who are all on board with the Dalai Lama’s Three Stream Buddhism through mindfulness, will create the appearance that this institutionalized sexual abuse of Tibetan Buddhism, that has existed for centuries, will be addressed through a ‘reconciliation process’ that has proven so successful at the U.N. as human trafficking, sexual slavery, rapes and corruption continue in rogue nations throughout the world. So much for ‘reconciliation’ to replaced sending people to jail, when only the appearance of justice matters these days: In other words, the usual ‘talking the problem to death’ that Buddhists love to do, so much. This will be the answer, as usual. What they always do when confronted with problems that force them out of their spiritual bubbles. Perhaps they can force an ‘apology out of Lama Sogyal’ and then he and they can wash their hands, and go back to their Tonglen practices of saving the world with their Buddhocracy movement, modeled on 1230 A.D. Tibet.

    Meanwhile, his Rigpa groups, reincarnated as mindfulness meditation centers and spiritual secular spas, can seduce more hapless westerners into the geopolitical movement to destroy western civilization, as we know it, replacing laws, ethics and western values with the corruption of religious despots increasingly controlling the narrative of what is right, what is wrong, as more people are confused into ‘not judging’ anything as wrong, except people who insist that something is very wrong with this attempt to hijack our western countries’ laws and ethics by medieval priests and western enablers, fanatic religious members of a Tantric cult, and their witless enablers:

    https://whatnow727.wordpress.com/2017/12/23/good-news-an-olive-branch/

    Like

  7. The Damage Control succeeded. Not a word about Sogyal in the U.S. news. This article by Mick Brown has one glaring problem. It is in the Guardian paper, a paper that still promotes the view that journalists not in these cults know best, that that their view that this is not institutionalized abuse, and that these lamas are working their western students together is not really happening, but that these lamas are all operating independently. That the Dalai Lama has no overseeing of the abuse, done by rogue lamas. So this article adds to the cover-up, doesn’t expose it.

    Unfortunately so many academics and journalists have been fooled by the Dalai Lama that their articles always miss the main point: that this is a coordinated Lamaist hierarchy working together, not separately and that to listen to Tibetan lamas, who have covered up for forty years, their institutionalized sexual abuses within their sanghas, is not the best place to go, for advice on how to deal with this abuse. The Lamas have always had the easiest time fooling the academics and journalists who believe they are too smart to be fooled.

    The cover-up of the What Now group, has so-far succeeded. thanks to well-established journalists who won’t listen to anyone outside the inner circle of the Lamas. Th Lamaist establishment swamp, so to speak,

    Sogyal’s Rigpa in Ireland, will go into ‘mindfulness and yoga meditation mode, ‘ as it becomes a spa for vegan food and ‘mindfulness’. So the lama’s succeeded so far. They don’t care how they fool people. Just as long as they do. Just like Trungpa’s Shambhala International became a yoga and mindfulness spa, and Sogyal was always modelling Trungpa, with his harems and Dzogchen mindfulness ruse. After the Regent’s scandalous exposure of Tibetan Buddhism, had there been real investigative journalists left, in 1990, and not those who had been seduced into the Tibetan lamas’ game that always made it a rogue lama, here and there, as the exception, and that is what this article still does with Lama Sogyal. Instead of realizing how they all these lamas are working in unison together with their Hindu Tantra, now that they are not fighting with each other but are now all on board with China’s soft power plan in the West. Like Ogyen Trinley, whom Mick Brown basically gave a pass in his book about the Communist Chinese Karmapa, who will take the Dalai Lama’s place. His book became more popular than the “Buddha’s Not Smiling” that exposed this Chinese Karmapa’s connections.

    Now journalists, are still quoting the Dalai lama, and offering him as the go-to-person for advice. Like recommending the head fox for the hens in the henhouse to stay safe if they follow the fox’s advice.

    Or how about Mingyur Rinpoche, good friend of Sogyal who is another Chinese Government favorite as China’s soft power,both in the West and China. He is who is being offered to give the Rigpa students advice. He is also busy in China Hong Kong, like his brother Lama Tsoknyi, great friend and protector of Soygal. These brothers have all been enabling and protecting Lama Sogyal, together, for the last forty years.

    But journalists who have been also protecting these lamas, indirectly, don’t want to hear what is happening REALLY inside these Tibetan Tantric groups. They only want to hear from those women still enabling the abuse because they are following other Tibetan Lamas with their institutionalized abuses and serial sexual consorts of their own.

    And of course, now come the articles about Scientology scandals which will also serve indirectly to cover up for Lama Sogyal’s abuses in the news Although I am sure the Lamas and their change agents devotees are all waiting for their shoe to drop. Still, the New York Times, which has yet to report anything about Lama Sogyal egegregious sexual and physical abuses of his students, – Hollywood’s favorite lama- with a major role in Bertolucci’s Little Buddha, and keeper of harems who beat his women,but a favorite lama Richard Gere and the the Hollywood jetset, is now reporting on the sexual abuses within Scientology.

    Journalism these days, being more in the Entertainment Industry doesn’t want to upset Hollywood and Richard Gere with reports on his forty-year collusion in covering up for Lama Sogyal. That’s lama Sogyal in the background of the picture: Here’s Richard’s Gere promoting the sexual abuser Lama Sogyal in the Telegraph in India:

    “Sogyal Rimpoche. who is a good friend of mine, has been a very good person as he has introduced me with so many great masters and extraordinary teachers in Asia and other countries.

    He is a very simple human being with a vast knowledge on Buddhism. Me talking about Buddhism in front of him would be a little embarrassing, I would feel myself as a parrot as I can only recite what I have learnt. But to be frank, I am not a great practitioner. But one thing is that I have truly generated respect and love for Dharma.”

    https://www.telegraphindia.com/1130429/jsp/siliguri/story_16838778.jsp

    That is is as predictable as the sun following a rainstorm, these Scientology articles,f since every major scandal of the Lamas always seems to be followed immediately by Scientology scandals, taking the news cycle by storm and creating another fire wall about the Lamas and helping cover up that their Tantra that is making the world crazy,. Scientology is like a disempowered foster child of the lamas, and the Tibetan Lamas’ best friend cult, since most people know Scientology is a cult , but don’t have clue and never have had a chance to know that Tibetan Lamas in their midst are far more dangerous because everyone thinks the Dalai Lama is a Saint and his Mindfulness is just an innocent technique to help people relax.

    Like

  8. I was never in rigpa, and have been aware of lamaism’s evil side, but I am shell shocked and saddened every time I hear accounts of it.

    what can I say that hasn’t been said before, belief systems can justify anything.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Hans you are now about to be exposed. Chris has burst your bubble. You really need to reply or you will look very foolish. If you think you are into reform I would like you to state that Sogyal is an enemy of Buddhism and is a sexual deviant who needs to have a life sentence as a sexual abuser, violent brainwasher and epicurean who was a total contradiction of the spiritual life he advocated.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Dear Hans, I listened to the 3 hour talk that you gave as a link. It was the usual, long, mixed up Hinayana, Mahayana and skirting the Tantra talk, that puts most of the audience is a semi-asleep trance, so he can get in his memes, while they are semi-asleep, about Tibetan Buddhism being more ‘secular’ friendly” and then ends the talk, implying that his teachings and practicing that will create more possibility of ending the ‘huge gap’ between the rich and the poor,. This jewel from the leader of a country, Tibet , only sixty years ago, that had the biggest gap between the rich (the lamas and their family government) and the poor: (the indentured life-time serfs and slaves of the lamas) of any country or territory on earth!

    I have to laugh to myself when I hear him up their pontificating about closing the gap and creating a more equal society, and implies that Tibetan Buddhism will actually create a ‘true socialist society.’ Yes, those modelled on other dictatorships, this one with a religious veneer that the lamas have planned for the world, while calling it “secular spirituality” another meme that makes me laugh, given the extreme guru-worship that goes on in all these lama sangha cells, with their own ‘living Buddhas’, like Sogyal. I only heard him mention the Bolshevik Revolution, along with the French Revolution for the first time, myself.

    I never mentioned Russian, in my comment. Where did you get that idea? As for Sogyal being disgraced in America? Not one major newspaper has taken up this issue in America, so far. Only the usual, ‘keeping it in house” and printed in the Shambhala cult’s “:Lion’s Roar’ or Tricycle, the Tibetan Tantra propaganda magazines, here in the States, that are holding on to controlling the narrative and confusing the the ex-Rigpa students and the still cult level devotees, with double messaging and endless discussions until it blows over. What Tibetan Lamaists always do.

    I don’t know what he means by Sogyal being ‘disgraced’ in America. That certainly is NOT taking place, and is still being repressed as news, here in the States, as usual. The United States mainstream news is the propaganda outlet for the Dalai Lama and all his tulkus. I usually have to read the India Times to know what DL is really doing.

    It was difficult to listen to it, having heard a thousand sleep- inducing talks, for nearly thirty years, by these lamas and their cult worshiping translators on these same topics, putting us in a semi-asleep trance so they could introduce their mind memes, interspersed.

    So I am not sure why the Dalai Lama made that remark about Sogyal being ‘disgraced in America.’ I couldn’t find it in the talk can you give me the location? When you say ‘my very good friend” and are making sure it is all taken care of ‘in- house,’ like the Dalai Lama and company have been doing for forty years, until it can be swept under the rug, after being discussed and talked to death, and he is not in jail? The Dalai Lama is making sure that Sogyal is NOT in jail. If that satisfies you, so be it.

    Like

  11. Hans are you not a bit confused? Did the DL refer to Sogyal being disgraced in America? I have no report of this happening recently have you? His advice is the same as given to supporters after Janice Doe in the ’90’s. Go to journalists!!!! Give me a break. No go and make a statement to police.

    ‘My very good friend, Sogyal, has been disgraced.

    He is a criminal not a friend. He should be asked to hand himself in to the police.

    There is no word ‘russian’ in his remarks.

    Please enlighten me as to the Russian quote?
    Now I appreciate context but could you please give us the relevant timings in this 3 hour video of the DL’s statements?

    Like

  12. To Chris Chandler. I don’t share your opinion that the Dalai Lama (DL) is not blaming lama Sogyal. On the contrary. When you listen to his remarks, he is saying in his broken english, some lamas disgrace themselves but also disgraced buddhism, as well. ‘My very good friend, Sogyal, has been disgraced.’ So he has disgraced but also he has disgraced himself and even worse the good reputation of buddhism. You beter read or listen to the whole speech. Since then the Dalai Lama has blamed lama Sogyal another 3 times for his misconduct, recently in Riga Lithuania on september 23 2017. ‘So Sogyal Rinpoche was disgraced recently in America. And so he maybe learned, but without any practice and experience of the teaching, therefore, abusing disciples, deceiving them.’ There is no word ‘russian’ in his remarks. Here’s a link to the teaching: https://youtu.be/46kukFKFJrM. Your critical approach towards lamaism and lama Sogyal in particular I appreciate very much. I also agree with you that a lawsuit would be the best thing to happen. But going over the top is not very helpful in the case.

    Like

  13. Otherwise, this is a good article that is getting close to looking at this as institutionalized abuse and not the abuse of a few rogue lamas, here and there. Almost there, getting closer….
    Didn’t mean to say the enabling nuns are also keeping serial sexual consorts, that was a duplicated phrase, that was about the other celebrity lamas that are now surrounding the Rigpa students to make sure they don’t get away. Just like they did with us, when the Regent scandal tore Vajradhatu apart.

    The enabling nuns are the Stockholm Syndrone victims of the lamas abuse. The larger group of enabling females, both inside Rigpa, and inside other Tibetan lamaist groups, are doing their duty to obey their own vajrayana gurus by protecting Lamaism as an institution. So is someone like S. Batchelor, who wants to protect the vajrayana Tantra, sans lamas, by saying it would be a shame if it hurt vajrayana Buddhism. What does he mean? Hurt the ‘no-good, no bad’ no right no wrong, non-duality view that always leads to the amorality and ‘anything goes’ suppress nothing, that has allowed these lamas to victimize their devotees and a whole country called Tibet? What is left of vajrayana Tibetan Tantra when you take away the lamas, the sexual couple bliss practices, the no-right no wrong, non-duality view that always leads to corruption and amorality when practiced on the ground and with groups of people. and never meant to be used as a despotic means to control groups, even countries? Stephen Batchelor was very helpful in starting to get people to think about being beyond gurus and lamas, but he is unwilling to call out the sexual practices that are endemic to vajrayana Buddhism. He is still loyal to his first master, the Dalai Lama and can’t bring himself to tell the truth to the public about the true nature of Tantra.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. The Dalai Lama is using the usual twilight and loaded language of Tibetan Tantra. He is not calling out Sogyal for the abuse. He is not saying Sogyal ‘disgraced himself.” Quite the contrary. He is subtly blaming the students of Sogyal for disgracing him. By saying, “My very good friend, Sogyal, has been disgraced.’ He is indirectly blaming the eight devotees of Sogyal for writing that letter about ‘his very good friend’ and disgracing Sogyal.. One has to know, after decades with dozens of these Tibetan lamas, how they use words to fool the public. Those who have taken Tantric vows with Sogyal, will know exactly what the Dalai Lama has said, and who is to blame, and it is never the lamas. They are never to blame. It is always those students with ‘imperfect perception’ who simply couldn’t understand the non-duality teachings of these lamas, who are always the ones at fault; if they see faults in their lamas, they are to blame

    All those many devotees, still in Lama Sogyal’s Rigpa centers? Will hear the Dalai Lama’s words, as he meant them to be heard. “you are at fault if you see any faults in Lama Sogyal.”

    Even these eight Rigpa students, who have started to wake up, are being surrounded by all the other lamas, many who also keep serial sexual consorts, their enabling nuns, many who keep serial consorts, their ex-Rigpa students who want to keep the dream of their new gurus sancrosanct and beyond reproach,.They will make sure Sogyal is the ‘exception’ until he can be rehabilitated. Meanwhile he will be ‘on retreat’ surrounded by his usual sycophantic devotees, and his harem, continuing to lead his sybaritic life-style and abusive existence, with his students, and Rigpa foundations still intact. All the ‘usual suspects’ will have accomplished, once again, making sure he avoids criminal charges for assault and sexual abuse and illegally keeping harems in Western countries and protecting the secrets of Tibetan Buddhism’s vajrayana Tantra. Nothing has changed. Nothing can change until people, outside these religious cults, demands that it change, by filing criminal assault charges against Sogyal and stops letting these cult gurus off the hook, over and over and over again, as they hide under a ‘religious’ label. These are cults, dangerous cults in our midst. Tibetan ‘Buddhism’ is not Buddhism, it is a cult of sexual abuse that has existed for a thousand years, based on the HIndu Tantric occult teachings and misogyny of eighth century sadhus and sorcerers, imported into Tibet and now imported into the West, to ‘nail all female energy’ down and to stupefy the West into giving us our freedoms. The lamas take the long view for their ‘civilization jihad.’ The fact that Sogyal is not in jail by now, shows how much they are succeeding.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.