Hearing not, and seeing not, it is the blind leading the blind. Martina Caffrey props up a deviant Christina

house11
Commentary on the Theology of Martina Caffrey by Mike Garde BD, MA in Theology.
The purpose of this response is not primarily a theological one, but rather to address the cultist dimension which Ms Caffrey seems to have missed. Also in the absence of any official Catholic theological response we feel the need to enter this debate.
Martina Caffrey reviews the Messages received by Christina Gallagher for the people of Ireland and the world, spanning the last 25 years, from Our Lady Queen of Peace and from Her Son Jesus.

martina-caffreychristina-gallagher-july1

Part 1
Messages of Love, Mercy and Repentance
©Copyright All Rights Reserved

We have matured as a country. We feel that we have evolved and developed in a greater way than previous generations. We feel that we have grown in knowledge so much that we know more about our world than other generations. We have outgrown the ‘superstitions’ of the past and have no need for such practices. We do not need religion especially the Catholic Church and God has been pushed to the fringes. The belief in God is still present but we have pushed Him into a box where He is a distant figure in our lives, someone to turn to or blame when everything goes wrong. However there is a vital flaw to this way of thinking which is that God is not a distant figure. He has always been present in the history of the world whether we believe in Him or not. God created our world and created us. We are the greatest part of His creation and He loves us as His children. He has shown this love down through human history when He sent His prophets to the people of Israel which culminated in sending His Son, Jesus Christ, as Our Saviour and thus entered physically into human history. Even when Jesus ascended into Heaven, having won our salvation and eternal life through His Death on the Cross and His Resurrection,

Here we find an orthodox expression of Catholicism but as one of our lay commentators Mick asked it seems to be totally unaware of the fact that Christina’s messages are totally beside the point. She is not recognised by the Archbishop of Tuam, Michael Neary and as a result has no standing. In other words she fails from the beginning as she has not demonstrated how we should accept the views of Christina as being Catholic. She just acts as if there is no problem when that is in fact what needs to be shown. Writing an MA thesis on the theology of the liturgy based on Pope Benedict XVI’s writings as Pope and Cardinal does not make her a Catholic theologian. I wonder if she has shared her views with her own bishop?

S3474-masterimage-R156
“Her academic research is into the theology of the liturgy based on Pope Benedict XVI’s writings as Pope and Cardinal, with a further book in the pipeline.”
He sent His apostles out into the world with a message of love, mercy and repentance. This message of Good News continued His own message of the coming of the Kingdom of Heaven and the need for repentance which He had preached during the three years of His public ministry.
We first note that her emphasis is on apostolic succession but there is no mention of the Holy Spirit as the Trinitarian response to the ascension of Jesus. The absence of the Holy Spirit leads to an unbalanced emphasis on Mariology, which becomes a Mariolatry.
Throughout the history of the Church, God has continued to reach out to humanity through chosen souls who have brought His message of love, mercy and repentance to the people of God and the world. God has often reached out to His children, especially through His Blessed Mother, Our Lady, at times of peril and danger both bodily and spiritually for His children. As our world has slipped more and more into sin, God has reached out to the world through Our Lady in more apparitions in the last century of the Church than in the previous two millennia. It is certain then that there is a greater need for the call of God to His people in our times than in any other previous generation. As we have turned away from God and religion, God has chosen to reach out to us in a proactive way calling us back to Him and asking us to repent. He offers His love and mercy and eternal salvation to those who hear Him, turn back to Him and accept His laws and commandments.

Here again we note this lack of Trinitarian theology and the immediate emphasis on Mariology and where Mary is in reality being made the Fourth member of the Trinity.

For more than 25 years, God has done just this in Ireland through the apparitions of His Blessed Mother to Christina Gallagher. God is reaching out to us through the messages given to Christina, asking us to repent and turn back to Him. We have become comfortable in our daily lives having pushed God aside until we decide when and how we will turn to Him in times of need and trouble and we feel uncomfortable hearing of what will happen to us if we persist in our sins.

We jump from the apostles and the focus of this theological reflection immediately focuses on Christina. This is in fact very unbalanced and in fact the God of Christina is a vindictive apocalyptic Manichean God that wants you to accept Christina’s teaching as the only way to survive the judgement. So in fact Christina’s private revelation becomes the public teaching of the Church. She along with her two theological advisers are the magisterium of the Prophet of Achill.
Like a people in denial, we don’t want to be challenged to change our lives even if it will give us a better world in which to live and raise our children. We turn away and refuse to listen to those who wish to disrupt our comfortable existence. This has happened throughout the history of our faith and it continues to happen in our treatment of the modern prophets. Just as prophets have been attacked and rejected in the past, Christina Gallagher has been submitted to brutal and very personal attacks by the media and the people of Ireland.

Like the prophets of Judah who were the paid servants of the kings Martina repeats the same old ramblings of Christina. No Christina is living the life of luxury and living a lie. Every time one of her new houses and wealth are discovered, she claims she has to have the luxury and ostentation because she is being hounded and stalked. Get real she has been shown to be a total scam and those who tasked with giving leadership to Catholics remain silent. She has the luxuries of her Jacuzzis and instead of bowing the knee and being baptised with the good news to the poor she has the audacity to claim she is the victim of persecution. She needs to become a prosecuted one.

Christina is the messenger chosen by God to warn us of the consequences of our actions but we are in a state of denial in this country and throughout the world and we do not wish to hear the words of God which threaten the bubble we have built around us in which God does not have a role. These attacks on Christina fulfil the words of Jesus in the Bible when He too was rejected and attacked not only in character but also bodily by those in His hometown of Nazareth to whom He first chose to reveal Himself as the Word Incarnate, the Son of God. On that occasion He said that a prophet is always rejected in his own home (Luke 4: 24) and this has proven true, especially in Ireland, when the reaction to Christina Gallagher’s mission to bring the message of God given through Our Lady was made public. For over 25 years she has struggled to bring the messages given to her to the people of Ireland and the world, only to be met with derision, slander and violent abuse. In our modern world where the media and internet have become so dominant, it is through these mediums that the stones are being cast from a ‘safe’ and sometimes anonymous distance. How many of those who attack Christina has actually read the messages which they so loudly condemn? Instead of relying on hearsay and gossip and ‘casting the first stone’, should we not first look at the messages which have been given and continue to be given to Christina to ascertain whether God may actually be using her to reach out to us and show us that He loves us and is still very much an active presence in our lives? In another place in the Bible, Jesus advises us that we would know His messengers by their actions, by the fruits of their labours (Matthew 7: 17-18). By looking at the messages given to Christina Gallagher, we can see that God has upheld and continues to uphold the truth of His message given to us by Our Blessed Mother.

Here Martina tries to make parallels between Jesus and Christina, and a reading of the text of Luke Ch 4 makes it very clear that Christina has no connection to what Jesus taught. She has succumbed to enriching herself and has not gone out to speak in public, but has hidden herself and refuses to actually address the issues raised about her. She has become a Prophet of profit and has turned away from the way of poverty, and obedience.

Filled with the Holy Spirit, Jesus left the Jordan and was led by the Spirit into the desert,

2 for forty days being put to the test by the devil. During that time he ate nothing and at the end he was hungry.

3 Then the devil said to him, ‘If you are Son of God, tell this stone to turn into a loaf.’

4 But Jesus replied, ‘Scripture says: Human beings live not on bread alone.’

5 Then leading him to a height, the devil showed him in a moment of time all the kingdoms of the world

6 and said to him, ‘I will give you all this power and their splendour, for it has been handed over to me, for me to give it to anyone I choose.

7 Do homage, then, to me, and it shall all be yours.’

8 But Jesus answered him, ‘Scripture says: You must do homage to the Lord your God, him alone you must serve.’

9 Then he led him to Jerusalem and set him on the parapet of the Temple. ‘If you are Son of God,’ he said to him, ‘throw yourself down from here,

10 for scripture says: He has given his angels orders about you, to guard you, and again:

11 They will carry you in their arms in case you trip over a stone.’

12 But Jesus answered him, ‘Scripture says: Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’

13 Having exhausted every way of putting him to the test, the devil left him, until the opportune moment.

14 Jesus, with the power of the Spirit in him, returned to Galilee; and his reputation spread throughout the countryside.

15 He taught in their synagogues and everyone glorified him.

16 He came to Nazara, where he had been brought up, and went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day as he usually did. He stood up to read,

17 and they handed him the scroll of the prophet Isaiah. Unrolling the scroll he found the place where it is written:

18 The spirit of the Lord is on me, for he has anointed me to bring the good news to the afflicted. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to captives, sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free,

19 to proclaim a year of favour from the Lord.

20 He then rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the assistant and sat down. And all eyes in the synagogue were fixed on him.

21 Then he began to speak to them, ‘This text is being fulfilled today even while you are listening.’

22 And he won the approval of all, and they were astonished by the gracious words that came from his lips. They said, ‘This is Joseph’s son, surely?’

23 But he replied, ‘No doubt you will quote me the saying, “Physician, heal yourself,” and tell me, “We have heard all that happened in Capernaum, do the same here in your own country.” ‘

24 And he went on, ‘In truth I tell you, no prophet is ever accepted in his own country.

25 ‘There were many widows in Israel, I can assure you, in Elijah’s day, when heaven remained shut for three years and six months and a great famine raged throughout the land,

26 but Elijah was not sent to any one of these: he was sent to a widow at Zarephath, a town in Sidonia.

27 And in the prophet Elisha’s time there were many suffering from virulent skin-diseases in Israel, but none of these was cured — only Naaman the Syrian.’

28 When they heard this everyone in the synagogue was enraged.

29 They sprang to their feet and hustled him out of the town; and they took him up to the brow of the hill their town was built on, intending to throw him off the cliff,

30 but he passed straight through the crowd and walked away.

31 He went down to Capernaum, a town in Galilee, and taught them on the Sabbath.

32 And his teaching made a deep impression on them because his word carried authority.

33 In the synagogue there was a man possessed by the spirit of an unclean devil, and he shouted at the top of his voice,

34 ‘Ha! What do you want with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us? I know who you are: the Holy One of God.’

35 But Jesus rebuked it, saying, ‘Be quiet! Come out of him!’ And the devil, throwing the man into the middle, went out of him without hurting him at all.

36 Astonishment seized them and they were all saying to one another, ‘What is it in his words? He gives orders to unclean spirits with authority and power and they come out.’

37 And the news of him travelled all through the surrounding countryside.

38 Leaving the synagogue he went to Simon’s house. Now Simon’s mother-in-law was in the grip of a high fever and they asked him to do something for her.

39 Standing over her he rebuked the fever and it left her. And she immediately got up and began to serve them.

40 At sunset all those who had friends suffering from diseases of one kind or another brought them to him, and laying his hands on each he cured them.

41 Devils too came out of many people, shouting, ‘You are the Son of God.’ But he warned them and would not allow them to speak because they knew that he was the Christ.

42 When daylight came he left the house and made his way to a lonely place. The crowds went to look for him, and when they had caught up with him they wanted to prevent him leaving them,

43 but he answered, ‘I must proclaim the good news of the kingdom of God to the other towns too, because that is what I was sent to do.’

44 And he continued his proclamation in the synagogues of Judaea.

The Church’s position on private revelation states that the faithful are free to promote the messages as long as the content of the messages does not constitute a danger to faith and morals. In an examination of the messages given to Christina Gallagher, even a cursory glance will tell us that there is no danger within these messages and that there is in fact a strong theological and scriptural basis in the messages which point to the Truth of the apparitions. This is all the more evident when Christina’s life story is compared with the messages and we find it highly improbable that a relatively uneducated woman who left school early, barely able to read and write, could invent such theologically in-depth messages and knowledge as Christina has displayed on many an occasion.

It seems likely that the methodology employed by Martina is to defend the messages before she has examined them herself the very thing she has claimed others are not doing. Just because the Catholic Church allows private revelation does not mean that what Christina’s messages should be taken with any seriousness especially when she has ignored the principle interpreter and authority in her diocese, namely the Archbishop of Tuam. The continued rebellion and avoidance of authority by her and her so called spiritual director who is also in flagrant disobedience to the Archbishop of Tuam is mind blowing. Also the failure of the Cardinal to exercise any spiritual discipline over this priest is an open wound in the Catholic Church in Ireland.

This is attributed to the grace of God who gives Christina infused knowledge on deeply theological matters which help to speak towards the divine origin of the apparitions and messages given to Christina. She has also the grace of being able to read souls, to see the state of that soul as God sees them, a gift which Padre Pio was also granted, and which has been demonstrated by Christina to many priests who have testified to its accuracy. The gift to the faithful of the messages from Our Lady is beyond measure as She has warned us of coming dangers to our bodies and souls which have been and will continue to be fulfilled in the future.

All this is pretty irrelevant while Christina and McGinnity are in rebellion. If Ms Caffrey is knowingly involved in this conspiracy then she is in grave danger spiritually.

She has also reminded us of the immense love and mercy which God the Father has for each one of us. Christina has often been criticised in the media for passing on messages of ‘doom and gloom’ which are claimed to show an angry, vengeful God and are given with the intent to scare people. A look at the messages published by Christina and her spiritual director, Fr. McGinnity, shows just how inaccurate this interpretation is by those who do not wish to understand.

We note again that not one single quote is produced to support her case, and what we have heard from eye witnesses is that simony is being practiced namely the promise of eternal life, and the escape of the judgement to come by purchasing pictures and by giving money for what is in fact the purchase of further properties. The Texas house was already referenced by Mick, but what is fact being taught is a sub Christian message and it is centred on the person of Christina with her mediator Gerard McGinnity under the guise of coming from Mary and neglecting the one mediator between God and Man, Christ Jesus. If Ms Caffrey has studied Cardinal Ratzinger as she claims he is about proclaiming this Christ of public revelation and not this pseudo gospel of Co-Redemption.
In the messages, we see a loving Mother pleading with Her children to repent and turn away from sin. They are messages of love and mercy which warn of the justice of God which will come upon us if we do not repent of our sins and turn back to God. The common theme of the messages given to Christina is to repent and turn away from sin, to turn back to God in prayer and fasting, to help others to turn to God and find their salvation and a warning that God’s justice will come on those who refuse to repent as sin and evil will be wiped away. God has given us free will to choose for ourselves and these messages are a plea from a loving Mother to choose wisely, to choose God rather than the Evil One.

Through a study of the messages given to Christina, it is evident that God is truly present here and that these messages are of divine origin. By looking at these messages in more detail, we can see several different ways in which the Truth of God shines through to help us to believe in the truth and authenticity of these messages.

We would expect a detailed review and referencing of the messages but what we have here is a Bord Failte propaganda piece for Achill.

©Copyright All Rights Reserved

15 Responses

  1. We will evaluate your claim after obtaining legal advice. We would see our use of the material as “fair usage.” Also we would need the copyright owner to contact us directly with this request. We can’t respond to anonymous requests. Failing that we have no duty to respond. Mike Garde Director Dialogue Ireland
    Having returned to Dublin and checked your IP it is obviously a Proxy. Could the Copyright owner formally reply requesting this be taken down for us to respond.
    Mike Garde
    Director DI

    Like

  2. Pat Coleman to overthrow Christina and Martina Caffrey to take over McGinnity’s role. I think she could have written the Ireland’s Eye August advert for the house of prayer

    Like

  3. Mr Garde you are consistently and extensively making use of copyrighted images without permission to embellish what is otherwise a tediously dull totally false and defamatory gossip-shop blog on the House of Prayer. You are hereby notified that you do not have permission from the owner for use of these images and texts and you are publishing them outside the boundaries of ‘fair trading’ and you are prejudicing the rights of the copyright owner. You are required to cease your use of all these images and texts and to remove them from your blog on this and all previous posts and to immediately desist.

    Like

  4. Delusional and willful ignorance

    Like

  5. Una said: “… likes to portray Ms. Caffrey as a great expert in theological matters.”
    It is clear that the website has described Ms Caffrey in truthful terms. She has a Masters Degree in Theology, a young Catholic writer with work published in the Catholic media. She is author of the book ‘A Fathers Love’. With expertise in the field of theology, as signified by her qualification, she is well placed to make an ‘expert’ overview of the messages given to CG by the Mother of God. Whether you like it or not the Archbishop has stated that the matter remains “open and unproven”. As such the Catholic Church position is that Catholics are permitted to believe and follow these messages. Caffrey has covered this in her article.
    http://www.christinagallagher.org/en/christina-gallagher-overview.htm

    Like

  6. The house of prayer likes to portray Ms. Caffrey as a great expert in theological matters. However, the only expert that matters is the Archbishop of Tuam who was appointed by the Pope as the lawful ecclesiastical authority of diocese where the house of prayer is located. The Archbishop of Tuam’s statements on the house of prayer are very clear. The house of prayer has no backing from the Catholic Church and the diocesan authorities have no confidence in the work that goes on there.

    Like

  7. Submitted on 2014/08/05 at 3:46 pm

    Caffrey’s article is an accurate overview of the Message of Our Lady to CG. Your ‘commentary’ only displays your ignorance of the very Messages she is writing about. Making false accusations such as – there is somehow a ” lack of trinitarian theology” in Our Lady’s messages – is yet another vain attempt, by you, to discredit them. Your ‘commentary’ is blatant deceit and your readers should know it and make their own minds up. I need only refer them to the regular blessing given by Our Lady when She says, and I quote, “I bless you, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.” Your whole post is riddled with the same obvious deceit as per my above comment and I could go on… I’d say Mike, it is you and Mick (the blind leading the blind) who are grasping at straws.
    Everyone else says WELL DONE CAFFREY!!
    http://www.christinagallagher.org/en/christina-gallagher-overview.htm

    Like

  8. You might note the earlier one which was correct. However, I do note your need to grasp at straws

    Like

  9. Mike Garde said: ‘my changing the name from Caffrey to Cassidy mid post. ‘
    Not ‘mid post’ Mike but in the title and all the way through and in the title of another post you got the author’s name wrong. Just another example of your misrepresentation of the truth.

    Like

  10. Thanks for bringing my changing the name from Caffrey to Cassidy and both in the title and mid post to my attention. Have amended that and look forward to further responses from your proxy address. I guess it was a Freudian slip using the name Cassidy! That was the Archbishop who copped on he had been deceived. You guys refer back to him and refuse to accept the current Archbishop’s ruling. Submit and you can be sure you will be taken seriously. You are in rebellion to your ordinary and please get Fr McGinnity to stop coming into a diocese where he is not welcome. Can you not read English? I will be writing another post soon so you can prepare a response.

    Like

  11. Mike Garde said: “The Messages of Our Lady are “totally beside the point”
    Mike, Ms Caffrey is writing about the Messages of Our Lady so how can the Messages of Our Lady be ‘beside the point, if that is precisely the focus of Ms Cassidy’s article???

    Mike Garde said: “…not recognised by the Archbishop… ….no standing”
    Mike, The Archbishop has clearly stated that the matter remains open and unproven and as such Catholics are free to believe these Messages. Ms Caffrey addresses this when she says “The Church’s position on private revelation states that the faithful are free to promote the messages as long as the content of the messages does not consitiute a danger to faith and morals.”

    Mike Garde said: ‘..We first note that her emphasis is on apostolic succession but there is no mention of the Holy Spirit…”
    What? The Messages of Our Lady is full of reference to the Holy Spirit. There is no absense of the Holy Spirit and therefore no unbalanced emphasis as you suggest. Your critique of the work of Ms Caffrey is ludicrous.

    Mike Garde said: “…Here again we note this lack of Trinitarian theology and the immediate emphasis on Mariology and where Mary is in reality being made the Fourth member of the Trinity.”
    What rubbish. This is a wild and unfounded allegation about the Messages of Our Lady to CG. I need only quote the regular blessing imparted in the Messages of Our Lady when she says to Her children; “I bless you, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.”

    Mike Garde said: “We jump from the apostles and the focus of this theological reflection immediately focuses on Christina. This is in fact very unbalanced and…”
    No, Mike, your analysis is again flawed. This paragraph is not about the apostles, it is about how we as a society have rejected God and how God calls us to repent and return to Him, as He has done throughout the ages. Again I must point out to you that the focus of the article is about the Messages of Our Lady to CG so it is unsurprising that attention would focus here. Caffrey says “Throughout the history of the Church, God has continued to reach out to humanity through chosen souls who have brought His message of love, mercy and repentance to the people of God and the world. God has often reached out to His children, especially through His Blessed Mother, Our Lady, at times of peril and danger both bodily and spiritually for His children.”

    Mike Garde said: “the God of Christina is a…”
    This is wrong. Caffrey rightly says “Christina has often been criticised in the media for passing on messages of ‘doom and gloom’ which are claimed to show an angry, vengeful God and are given with the intent to scare people. A look at the messages published by Christina and her spiritual director, Fr. McGinnity, shows just how inaccurate this interpretation is by those who do not wish to understand. In the messages, we see a loving Mother pleading with Her children to repent and turn away from sin. They are messages of love and mercy which warn of the justice of God which will come upon us if we do not repent of our sins and turn back to God….”

    Mike Garde said: “… is living the life of luxury and living a…”
    You know nothing about the life of CG and it is now also clear you know nothing about the Messages she has received from Our Lady.

    Mike Garde said: “… tries to make parallels… …and has not gone out to speak in public, but has hidden herself and refuses to actually address the issues raised about her..”
    In this section Caffrey has made relevant reference to the fulfilment of Jesus’ words in the bible on the rejection of a prophet, as He Himself was at Nazareth. I think, based on your shabby and ridiculous so-called commentary of this article, might this comment by Cassidy be relevant to you?; “How many of those who attack Christina has actually read the messages which they so loudly condemn? Instead of relying on hearsay and gossip and ‘casting the first stone’, should we not first look at the messages which have been given and continue to be given to Christina to ascertain whether God may actually be using her to reach out to us and show us that He loves us and is still very much an active presence in our lives?”
    It is well known that CG speaks in public most Saturdays at the HOP. I think you will find also that the people who have the right to believe and support the work of this mission have made clear their thoughts on your vindictive hate-filled campaign against CG and FMG in their public statements which they have placed on the www christinagallagher .org website.

    Mike Garde, the falsity of your ‘commentary’ continues in its absurdity from here on and your every comment could be challenged with ease. You couldn’t even get the author’s name right !! What I would like to say about this article is WELL DONE Ms Caffrey for your accurate presentation of the Messages of Our Lady to CG.

    http://www.christinagallagher.org/en/christina-gallagher-overview.htm
    Read it for yourself people.

    Like

  12. HI Mike congrats on your analysis of this recent blog as per. Martina Caffrey…I would just like to say that I pity this poor deluded woman and just wonder if she has studied the contents of these meesages that are supposedly God given and are so contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ…..I would put a simple argument to her and let her explain how does this fit into her thesis that CG and McGinnity are guided by our heavenly Father ….Why as her messages state that her HOP is the only place where we can find redemption during the great chastisement ….I find this to be a total nonsence and indeed totally heretical….I would like to recall a situation that I encountered some years ago…..It was the case of a lady of mature years who was told that she would need to purcase a picture of Our Lady weeping tears of blood at the cost of 280 euros and that praying before this picture would grant salvation and protection to herself and her family….As she could not afford this ammount of money she asked to buy a postcard version of this picture for 5 euros……She was told that only the expensive version of this picture would give her and her loved ones the protection promised by Our Lady during the great chastisement……The lady in question here was so inscensed by this and indeed considered herself too intelligent to accept this what she believed to be a form of blackmail and decided to ring the Arch Bishop of Tuam Michael Neary……According to what he said to her as per quote…..He said that he was very aware what was going on in Achill and also told her he had a room filled with documents and files all dealing with complaints …..Then he went on to explain to her that he had no power or influence over McGinnity as he is under the authority of the diocese of Armagh and then went on to tell her that he had reported on many occasions to Brady his superior as head of the Catholic Church here in Ireland but never receivred any satisfaction the whole scenario was to be brushed under the carpet……And thus the cat and mouse game between Tuam and Armagh……and it continues……..So all this now begs the question and indeed many more……Are the hierachy and powers that be still turning a blind eye to McGinnity in his support of this charleton who has robbed so many people and destroyed so many families Or are they afraid that McGinnity has alot more ammunition as he has previously threatened to expose a deeply flawed church in which homosexuality was rampant and how they covered up the greatest sin of all in my book that of the sexual abuse of our little children….I note that their next big day is 25th of july……This I remember was called the fraternity day and used to attract big crowds…….Now I see they are calling it the day of healings when they want all of those who proclaim that they were healed thru divine intervention and Christina Gallagher What do I say to you Christina……Shame on you……shame …to have to have preyed on the elderly and the most vulnerable members of our society……And I go back to my earlier statement and address this lady Martina who is and claims to be an apologist for the HOP…….You strike me as intelligent…….It takes time to absorb and study the messages of CG……I keep coming back to the message which broke the camels back for me and I shall repeat it as I heard it that day in the HOP as read out by McGinnity….If the people will not pay for my HOP in Texas then I will destroy the whole state of Texas……This to me was the end of having anything to do with CG and McGinnity ever again….Ofcourse Texas was not destroyed……and yet the people paid up and no doubt contributed to her next palatial residence…..Thank you……Mick

    Like

  13. Martina Caffrey’s argument is ludicrous when pointing to evidence of authenticity: “This is all the more evident when Christina’s life story is compared with the messages and we find it highly improbable that a relatively uneducated woman who left school early, barely able to read and write, could invent such theologically in-depth messages and knowledge as Christina has displayed on many an occasion.”

    I have not come across any information on Gallagher’s life story accept she was a tarot card reader. It is too easy to give an impression of austere religious living to authenticate a message, which Gallagher and McGinnity presented in the beginning. The old argument of uneducated or “relatively uneducated” people who give messages is a very old argument reminiscent of Fatima and Lourdes. In Christina Gallagher’s case it is laughable.

    A video I watched on Dialogue shows how she even has acquired the cadence of McGinnity’s voice while giving the messages. I honestly cannot see how her predictions could be seen as authentic, in fact, I do not hear anything that another person could not ‘predict’ if put in the superstitious ‘catholic’ environment she insists she is part of. Many people claim to predict events, however, thank God they do not insist that they speak for Jesus or Our Lady or feel entitled to extract money from gullible believers on the basis of, so called, authenticity. Is it the case that she takes fiscal advantage of her ‘messages’ being believed as divinely given?

    Like

  14. Hand over all your wealth to Christina Gallagher and she will save you (or by the time you find out your mistake, it will be too late to ask for your money back)

    Like

  15. Hand over all your money to the house of prayer and God will save you!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: