Tell the truth the pair of you!

Letter to the Editor- Irish Catholic July 2009.

A call for clarity

Dear Editor,

I am a professional man who has had some association with the House of Prayer, Achill since the late 90s, having visited there, usually on an annual basis at the request of an elderly parent. I was initially impressed at the eloquence and spirituality of Fr G McGinnity, but the final straw for me (as the message purportedly from heaven had become increasingly disturbing in recent times) was on July 16, 2006, when Fr McGinnity read out a message as per Ms Gallagher in which she stated that Our Lord threatened to destroy the State of Texas if a large sum of money was not paid within nine months to complete one of her houses of prayer. This to me was an insult to anybody’s intelligence.

I move forward now to January 2008 to recount a conversation which took place between me and Mrs Gallagher. A friend of mine informed me of a newspaper article alleging of Ms Gallagher having amassed a vast fortune to the tune of millions in various properties and top-of-the-range cars etc., despite having just a small income. I was astonished when I read the article and saw the pictures of vast houses and a BMW car. After all, I had often heard this lady say she had no interest in material goods and would gladly live in a tent.

As I didn’t know what to believe, I spoke to her directly. She reacted angrily and spoke disparagingly of a former devotee who she said had spoken to the press, told lies about her and had libelled her and her family. On her reported properties, she said she was forced to sell her Newport house (due to media pressure?) and this was purchased by HOP devotees as it was to be turned into a shrine to her and be called the ‘Blue Ivory Trust’.

When I questioned her about her daughter’s house in Ballina, she stated this was purchased from the proceeds of the sale of her Newport house and it was her daughter’s inheritance.

On her €4 million Malahide mansion, she denied any knowledge of this and said it was a fabrication by the press. She said the only time she went to Dublin was to visit a hospital for medical treatment and on those occasions stayed with her sister. I asked “does that mean that you are homeless?” and she reacted angrily again and stated she was happily married and living with her husband in Knockmore, Co. Mayo.

At the time I accepted her explanations and asked what she was going to do regarding the press reports. She said she was heading for the High Court to sue for libel and character assassination. I agreed this would be the correct course of action.

As the weeks went by and the reports became more lurid, I waited for Ms Gallagher’s High Court proceedings to silence the press. There was nothing. All the serous broadsheets are now reporting on the activities of the HOP finances. The Church also spoke out and made its disapproval and position clear. I listened with dismay to Fr McGinnity’s weak replies to Joe Duffy denying any knowledge of Ms Gallagher’s wealth. I watched in astonishment his disappearance behind a door on Primetime, refusing to be interviewed – he who could have brought clarity and truth in relation to what was now becoming a national scandal.

I read with further dismay how Ms Gallagher settled vast amount of money to her disgruntled elderly followers and even silenced them through a legal clause.

What does this all speak of? Why the failure to speak out publicly and provide clarity if they have nothing to hide?

I write this letter with great sadness as I know there are many people who are hurt, bewildered and confused. Where is the transparency and accountability in this sordid situation?

I know I will be relegated to the ranks of the anti-Christ or an agent of the devil for daring to criticise Christina and Fr McGinnity, but I challenge them to come forward now and speak openly and provide clarity regarding the issues raised in this letter.

If not, their silence speaks for itself.

I wish to make it clear there is nothing personal in this letter. I just want the truth to be told, as truth always wins out at the end of the day.

Yours etc.,

Name and address with the editor.

23 Responses

  1. but you still cling to hearsay and the someone told someone basis of your accusations.

    Corroborated testimony, cheque copies and land registry records are hearsay? Since when? When you compare this to the ‘evidence’ you have offered I think I’ll side with the corroborated testimony, cheque copies and land registry records.

    you couldnt give a single piece of proof to rebutt the challenges I posed.

    I have no need to answer your ‘challenges’. My intent here is to publicise the goings-on in the House of Prayer, and to take issue to comments you have been making that are attempting to distract from the issue of the House of Prayer scamming people out of their cash to keep Christina in luxury.

    I did not need to “assasinate poor old Anthony”, as you state.

    It’s ‘character assassinate’, and it is the extent of what you have offered in response to him.

    I want to thank you for not “doctoring” my comments, as you could well have done!

    I don’t roll like that, and as long as I have moderation power on this blog these threads will not roll like that either. Any person can post their opinion here (subject to decency). Censorship is only used by those who have something to fear from truth.

    they will be better informed about the two sides of the story and may then wish to venture to The House of Prayer and discover what really is important there…..

    This is true. I can even give you a good analogy that is relevant here. At the Mind Body Spirit festival in Cork I have protested the Scientology stalls there, and simply by having our signs it gives the public a greater sense of skepticism whenever they encounter those stalls. If the case in the House of Prayer was solely one of people giving modest donations then I wouldn’t have any issue. The information now in the public domain will hopefully have increased public skepticism so that people will not allow themselves to be pressured into making large donations, as happened to folks like the Morrissey’s.

    Yes I respect your right to be emotional about issues and defense of elderly etc.
    ….
    But I would ask you to modify you belief that hurting the innocent is acceptable collateral in a campaign.

    The latter is contradicted by the former. Bringing to light the occurrence of elderly exploitation in order to help prevent it is the only defensible act given the available evidence. ‘Collateral damage’ is a poor excuse for censoring this information. Now that the information has been widely publicised in the media those being ‘damaged’ by the exposure have a choice about whether they wish to continue supporting this organisation.

    But one day after this life we WILL meet.

    No comment.

    I have only ever posted articles under my own name.

    I remind you, once again, that I can connect your posts using your IP information. Honestly I don’t really care whether someone posts under a consistent name or not unless they are doing sockpuppetry.

    perhaps I enjoyed our fencing with blunted rapiers.

    Actually I suspect it is more to do with encountering a polar opposite opinion. You get a better conversation than if it were in a group of mutual reinforcement.

    Like

  2. Themadhair…A good try…but you still cling to hearsay and the someone told someone basis of your accusations.

    Despite the HUGE headlines …you couldnt give a single piece of proof to rebutt the challenges I posed.
    I did not need to “assasinate poor old Anthony”, as you state.

    He assasinated himself by posing as a total fraud and by his actions in the whole locality of Achill Sound. ( Which incidentally can be also verified by local Gardai…re issues having NOTHING to do with The House of Prayer.)

    This will be my final posting. I want to thank you for not “doctoring” my comments, as you could well have done!

    In conclusion, I think that if any reasonably-minded person reads our mutual exchanges, they will be better informed about the two sides of the story and may then wish to venture to The House of Prayer and discover what really is important there…..

    Yes I respect your right to be emotional about issues and defense of elderly etc.
    I respect your right to be non-Christian.
    But I would ask you to modify you belief that hurting the innocent is acceptable collateral in a campaign.
    Maybe one day we meet and recognise each other. But one day after this life we WILL meet.
    Despite your allegations (questions) I have only ever posted articles under my own name.
    I will keep you at times in my prayers…not for any particular reason…perhaps I enjoyed our fencing with blunted rapiers.
    Donal

    Like

  3. OK…then it ought to be easy for you to get the official Gardai statement.

    Read the article. There was no official statement, they contacted the gardai and reported on what they were told.

    And maybe when you are in contact with the same Gardai you might get total verification that Anthony Tierney was NEVER denied medical care nor assistance.

    Please provide evidence that the gardai verified such. For all your continual denials it has to be pointed out that not one jot of actual evidence has been presented to refute any of the claims made against the House of Prayer other than assertions.

    The rather gaping hole in your story should also be mentioned here. IF I were in your shoes and if everything you say were true then I would have presented this gardai account, with some evidence or their statement, and let that be the end of it. But if I were you and if what you say were not true and if I had you same unwavering devotion to Christina – then I would probably have tried to character assassinate old Anthony. Guess which path you you choose?

    you might get clarification that NO fraud was ever committed by House of prayer

    The Morrissey’s produced the cheques made out to John Rooney, and you have confirmed that John Rooney bought that huge swanky mansion that Christina has lived in. I think that is most deserving of the label of ‘fraud’.

    and therefore no charges are to be expected.

    Defrauding people through their religion is, sadly, not an illegal offence in this country. Despicable and repugnant, but not actually illegal.

    it will greatly put a lot of minds at ease and gain you a multidude of admirers.

    Actually it would not. What it would do is increase the hurt already felt by those who have been defrauded by the House of Prayer. It would give the House of Prayer reprieve in their activities to continue gouging money out of people. Given that you have provided pretty much nothing other than bald assertion in response to the charges made against the House of Prayer, and remembering those cheque copies and land registry records needed some serious answers, I think I am quite entitled to continue telling the story that you clearly do not want told. Namely that the House of Prayer has used the religious beliefs of its followers to scare money out of them for Christina’s luxury lifestyle.

    Like

  4. OK…then it ought to be easy for you to get the official Gardai statement.

    And maybe when you are in contact with the same Gardai you might get total verification that Anthony Tierney was NEVER denied medical care nor assistance.

    And to close out that section of comments you might get clarification that NO fraud was ever committed by House of prayer …and therefore no charges are to be expected.

    All the best with such efforts…it will greatly put a lot of minds at ease and gain you a multidude of admirers.

    Like

  5. There IS a difference between ownership and living as a guest
    in a premises.

    Remember kids – defrauding the flock out of their cash is ok as long as you are careful over whose name is on the title deeds of the house you buy with the money. But, to be fair, more heinous acts have been defended using flimsier technicalities.

    Regarding refunds…you ignored the challenge…

    I could have sworn I linked to newspaper articles on this. Including one paper who contacted the gardai to confirm such a refund…

    Like

  6. There IS a difference between ownership and living as a guest
    in a premises.

    So you ought to recant on your mantra of “ownership”.

    Regarding refunds…you ignored the challenge…

    So on that basis, sir, your case is thrown out of court!

    Like

  7. Hold on, stop da show and slow it down. Stop me if ah go wrong here.

    Dese loonies, through this Rooney fella, gathered up the dough. This fella den spent it on a swanky palace that dis Christina lives in? That about it so far?

    Now dis Donal fella is playing the technicality that it is dis Rooney fella, but not Christina, dat owns it? That about it so far?

    Either Donal is takin’ da piss or is assuming dat da people is really f***ing dopey.

    Like

  8. POST PROOF THAT CHRISTINA GALLAGHER OWNS THE MALAHIDE PROPERTY AND YOU WIN THIS ARGUEMENT HANDS DOWN.

    You know those cheques that the Morrissey’s presented, that were made out to John Rooney, of their donations? And you know how, in this thread, you made the admission “NOBODY disputes that J.Rooney purchased a house in Malahide.”. And, to finish, we have the fact that she is living there.

    What you are trying to do is to choose very careful language to try dancing around the above. To try and claim that Christina doesn’t own the house, while ignoring the small matters that she lives there and that the House of Prayer was used to fundraise for it, won’t get you too far.

    Or to put it explicitly for the current House of Prayers, since it needs repeating, your donations were used to buy this Malahide mansion using John Rooney as the proxy.

    Like

  9. Then show me…and everyone that Christina Gallagher OWNS
    the house in Malahide.
    NO land Reg record shows this…why do you pesrsit in lies…

    That is my final challenge….POST PROOF THAT CHRISTINA GALLAGHER OWNS THE MALAHIDE PROPERTY AND YOU WIN THIS ARGUEMENT HANDS DOWN.

    FAIL to do that and I WIN THIS ARGUEMENT FULLY AND TOTALLY.

    Like

  10. I am not sure what you mean by “Eddie Fy….?

    I can post the screenshots of the relevant IP information proving that you posted under this name if you want? When you make posts under different names those posts can be linked to your computer.

    I have honestly and sincerely tried to emphasise that there was NO FRAUD perpetrated by anyone connected to The House of Prayer.

    Attacking all and sundry in the manner you have, while ignoring the relevant documentary evidence, is neither honest nor sincere. The members of the House of Prayer have a right to know how their donations have been used to provide Christina with luxury mansions. Using the religious beliefs of members in order to gouge money out of them is fraud – and nothing you have said on this website has addressed this in any meaningful manner.

    Your whole case is based on the complaints of about less than 10 people….

    And cheque copies and the land registry records to verify those complaints. Why do you keep ignoring these pieces of evidence which show these complaints to be true?

    and their version would be rebutted by the tens of thousands

    It would be a very interesting experiment to show these ‘tens of thousands’ the land registry records and to show them the luxury mansions that their donations were used to buy. After you have presented them with all the information it would be interested whether they would still consider themselves to have been honestly treated.

    The Sunday World, involved in desperation by McCrory

    It is funny you keep harping on about the Sunday World and Michael despite the blog article involving neither of them. The people who have told their story have done so, and the land registry records / cheque stubs verify their claims. Trying to shoot the messenger will not alter the message or the associated supporting documentation.

    The facts that this huge group CHOSE to make a place of refuge available to Christina

    I assume by ‘refuge’ you really mean ‘luxurious mansions’.

    And YOUR site accuses repeatedly Christina of “owning” a mansion which she does NOT own.

    The land registry records prove otherwise.

    NOBODY disputes that J.Rooney purchased a house in Malahide.

    You do realise that you have denying that the House of Prayer donations have been used for such? Remember that the Morrissey’s provided cheque copies showing that John Rooney was the recipient of their donations, and this house, or rather mansion, is where those donations ended up. This is the simple case of fraud that I have been repeating over and over now, and it is good that you have finally taken a step towards acknowledging this.

    they were coerced into first making their grievance thru The Sunday World in a most unfair and despicable manner.

    Evidence for this? I know you like making these types of accusations, but you do so without any evidence whatsoever and in defiance of both the Morrissey’s testimony and in defiance of the evidence they have presented. They gave a lot of money to the House of Prayer in good faith, and I applaud them for speaking out when they discovered what their money was really used for. When people get scammed in such a way they can choose to air that grievance so as to warn others. That is both fair and warranted given the circumstances. And, according to this article by the Independent it appears they did in fact go to the Gardai contrary to your claims.

    Again…because there was a plot to vilify and to demean and defame Christina Gallagher.

    Consider the marked difference between myself and yourself. My basic accusation is based upon the testimony of people like the Morrissey’s, their cheques and the land registry records which show where the money went. Your accusation is unfounded and unevidenced conspiracy. You are correct in that I am indeed vilifying Christina, in large part because I think the abuse of others through their faith to scam cash out of them warrants such vilification, but I refuse to accept that pointing out the cold hard nature of the scam is demeaning or defaming.

    Why are you behaving like a broken record and trotting out the same old mantra of shit that you do.

    Because this issue is remarkably clear. The House of Prayer has taken large sums of cash off people through the vehicle of religion, and used that money to keep Christina in a life of luxury. This needs to repeated at every opportunity as long as the scam continues to operate. All your attacks on the Sunday World, Jim, Michael, the Morrissey’s, etc. are attempts to distract from that – hence the necessity of the repetition.

    you were cruelly used by the cynical tabloid shit which cast you aside as soon as you became “old news”

    So, according to this logic, giving someone a platform to tell their story is more abusive that using their religion to scare large sums of money out of them? I suggest that your judgement, when it comes to being used, is sorely misguided.

    I also challenged you to provide evidence that Christina Gallagher had refunded one cent to anyone…and you couldnt…

    The articles I linked to, including the one linked in this post, show just that. If you be so good as to get the gag order lifted I am sure the reporters involved would be able to tell you much more.

    HAD there been fraud, there WOULD have been DPP action….

    Sadly, defrauding people under the guise of religion is not illegal in this country. It is a repugnant and disgusting abuse of personal faith, but not illegal.

    I an VERY clear that any fairminded person who takes time to review at least a few of these points might think that this is NOT the one-sided blast of accusations which you repeat

    That is for the readers to decide. I do hope that said readers will not the constant reliance you have on attempted character assassination and appeal to conspiracies.

    Like

  11. I am not sure what you mean by “Eddie Fy….? The only Eddie in the group who have access to this system is Eddie Donnelly.

    I have honestly and sincerely tried to emphasise that there was NO FRAUD perpetrated by anyone connected to The House of Prayer.

    Your whole case is based on the complaints of about less than 10 people….and their version would be rebutted by the tens of thousands who visited and supported this work thru the past 20 years.

    The Sunday World, involved in desperation by McCrory, exaggerated and distorted EVERY fact and truth behind the various activities of the supporters of The House of Prayer as they collected funds and enable a great extension to the House and its operation.
    The facts that this huge group CHOSE to make a place of refuge available to Christina for her lifetime only…is totally distorted by J.Gallagher, And YOUR site accuses repeatedly Christina of “owning” a mansion which she does NOT own.

    So I am turning all this back on YOU….and laying down a direct challenge to provide evidence to back up your accusations…and do so without drawing 2nd and 3 parties into this.
    NOBODY disputes that J.Rooney purchased a house in Malahide.
    NOBODY denies that Michael and Betty Morrissey gave big donations …but then had a change of heart and decided to ask for their money back….HOWEVER…..they did NOT approach The House of Prayer, nor the local fundraiser whom they knew well…nor anyone connected to the fundraising efforts….nor to the Gardai…
    NO…they were coerced into first making their grievance thru The Sunday World in a most unfair and despicable manner.
    So was that a NORMAL process? Wouldnt a normal person seek first to go back to the people to whom they had given the donation?

    Again…because there was a plot to vilify and to demean and defame Christina Gallagher.
    Why are you behaving like a broken record and trotting out the same old mantra of shit that you do.
    And sleep well in your warm beds…Michael and Betty…..you were cruelly used by the cynical tabloid shit which cast you aside as soon as you became “old news”

    I also challenged you to provide evidence that Christina Gallagher had refunded one cent to anyone…and you couldnt…yet you still persist in your shit attempts to evade the facts. HAD there been fraud, there WOULD have been DPP action….

    So here we have “check-mate” .

    I an VERY clear that any fairminded person who takes time to review at least a few of these points might think that this is NOT the one-sided blast of accusations which you repeat

    Like

  12. I am amazed that you “themadhair” continually jump in to answer/respond on behalf of all and sundry…

    Most people do not spend all their time moderating/viewing this website. Since I do the moderating I have to check in regularly to remove any inappropriate comments (a good example was your anti-Islamic comment you posted under the name ‘Eddie fy’). It also means I tend to have time to make responses to comments when needed.

    it’s as if you cannot trust them not to make a proper ballocks of themselves.

    Someone may benefit from taking their own advice here…

    Which naturally would leave your articles facing contradiction

    They are not our articles. We archive articles from a variety of sources if they are relevant to the issue of cultism.

    So its good to now see the vendetta so-called group now reduced to one non-christian voice…

    It actually helps to view this topic from a non-Christian perspective. The heart of this case is one of simple fraud, and Christianity is the vehicle that the House of Prayer is using to achieve that. Followers are being gouged to fund Christina’s lavish lifestyle. Pretty simple to see given the available evidence. Unfortunately, for some, the Christianity aspect only serves to cloud what is really going on here.

    I know I have repeated this request in multiple incarnations now, but is there any chance that you would actually comment on the blog article itself? You know, the actual issue of fraud that is of concern?

    Like

  13. I am amazed that you “themadhair” continually jump in to answer/respond on behalf of all and sundry….it’s as if you cannot trust them not to make a proper ballocks of themselves.
    Which naturally would leave your articles facing contradiction
    So its good to now see the vendetta so-called group now reduced to one non-christian voice…nice one.

    Like

  14. @ Michael

    Please give us your real name if you truly believe what you say.

    Don’t go there. Seriously, do not go there. Just because you have a name to put with an argument does not make that argument true or false. It has no bearing on the argument whatsoever. If people want to post anonymously then are free do so – regardless of what they mistakenly believe.

    @ Donal

    he still tries to malign Fr McGinnity and Christina Gallagher.

    The defrauding of people out of cash for Christina’s luxury lifestyle did that. It amuses me that you think character assassinating a Michael somehow absolves these two off all they have done. Michael did not defraud anyone out of cash by using the personal faith of the flock against them. He did not force Christina and John Rooney to buy lavish properties with said cash. So trying to blame Michael is addressing absolutely none of the concerns being expressed regarding the House of Prayer. So why persist so doggedly on this site?

    I have heard that there are several skeletons in danger of falling out of various cupboards.

    It amuses me how you try rebutting Michael with ”the typical old someone told someone” while using a line of attack such as this. It isn’t that difficult to see where you are coming from when you apply double standards like this.

    Regarding statements made at different times by Sunday World reporter lying that he had been named as “satan” or words to that effect in the House of Prayer…and nothing is further than the truth…such NEVER happened, never could happen and will not happen because the prayers said at the HoP are about forgiveness and reconciliation.

    I have to wonder where all this “forgiveness and reconciliation” is being displayed. So far on these comments sections you have degraded and insulted all and sundry who have spoken out about the House of Prayer. You have utterly refused to adequately address the actual issues, namely the defrauding of cash and the luxury mansions bought with said cash, and proceeded to denigrate and character assassinate Michael, the doctor, Jim, etc.

    To put the above in another way – claiming the House or Prayer is about forgiveness and reconciliation while your own comments display just the opposite is a pretty obvious display of empty contradictory rhetoric. Good luck with that.

    But I would have (if I were Michael) some thoughts about the integrity and perhaps state of mind of “the doctor”…

    You have already tried this line of attack with both Michael and the poor chap who fell of the ladder. Do you really think you can brand all ex-House of Prayer devotees as being mentally deficient? Worth pointing out that the doctor was considered sane when he was still supporting the House of Prayer. I am sensing a theme here.

    I am talking cold hard facts!

    I see no facts but only assertions. When your assertions are compared to the cheque copies, the land registry records, etc. they fall very flat.

    Christians in all ages from the first century have needed places of refuge.

    And, as a good example, Christina who requires multi-million-euro mansions as refuge.

    those HE chose as HIS prophets were always misunderstood and persecuted.

    I am not a Christian, but it would seem to me that the folks who were prophets in the Christian religion were not living the life or luxury, nor where they terrorising people out of their cash to fund their lavish lifestyle. The contrast between Moses, Jesus and Christina is pretty stark.

    Why be fixated about material things…

    Surely you should be telling this to Christina? Given that, out of everybody involved, she seems most in need of hearing this.
    prophet needs a roof over their heads, and a place of safety for a time…
    Is this your way of justifying the multiple mansions Christina has bought with her follower’s cash? If this were a play it would be hysterical, but it is not a play and real people have had money gouged out of them by this scam.

    Like

  15. To Marsha Blanchard…

    Christians in all ages from the first century have needed places of refuge. Heaven expects us to listen and to respond in a practically way to ensure that we..The Body of Christ will continue to spread His teaching.

    In all ages…BEFORE CHRIST…and After Christ,,,those HE chose as HIS prophets were always misunderstood and persecuted.

    Why be fixated about material things…these are passing and of no value in the next life. BUT>>>>A prophet has a role from Hod to fulfi;ll and if that prophet needs a roof over their heads, and a place of safety for a time….Is that not understandable? And at the end of the day a shroud has no pockets!!!!

    Like

  16. Michael…I am not just talking about points of belief , which are personal and always debatable as having another side to the story. NO…I am talking cold hard facts!
    My real name is as logged, as I trust is yours.
    Donal C

    Like

  17. Donald Corr ! Please give us your real name if you truly believe what you say. Mike Mc Crory.

    Like

  18. It is really sad to see that Michael McCrory still has not seen the dirty path that he chose to follow and how he still tries to malign Fr McGinnity and Christina Gallagher.
    If asked, Michael, what would you say about your own marital status?
    You continue to applaud “the doctor”, whom even the dogs in the street know is Dr M.Anketell.
    If HE was “stress tested” what do you think the outcome would now be? I have heard that there are several skeletons in danger of falling out of various cupboards. And how would HE define his current marital status?
    Regarding statements made at different times by Sunday World reporter lying that he had been named as “satan” or words to that effect in the House of Prayer…and nothing is further than the truth…such NEVER happened, never could happen and will not happen because the prayers said at the HoP are about forgiveness and reconciliation.
    Michael McCrory’s comment about having been referred to as a “bastard” is the typical old someone told someone…and as you know this type of crap is inadmissable as evidence of astrength. But I would have (if I were Michael) some thoughts about the integrity and perhaps state of mind of “the doctor”….whom I myself witnessed having to gulp down about 3 glasses of whiskey before being able to make a short speech to pilgrims. That sort of testimony aint impressive Michael…..and you too were there on that day!!!!!

    So maybe in their own minds J.Gallagher and Michael are classifying themselves as they wish to be seen…that’s a natural trend when one’s mind goes awry….but it can be cured by a period of rest and meaningful meditation.

    Good luck guys….you were never an impressive bunch and the more time goes on the more pathetic you appear.

    Like

  19. This entire ‘House of Prayer’ scandal and scam is sad. Simply put, our personal hope and the hope of all of mankind is in Jesus Christ . Jesus does not need a building to protect us, He did that on the cross. We have been paid for, period. It is finished.
    This woman and the priest, unless they are suffering from some kind of mental illness, have preyed upon the old, helpless and those that are not familiar with the word of God.
    We must pray for them or they may lose their souls.

    Like

  20. I forgot to mention that on two different occasions in speaking with the doctor ,above this holy ‘. woman , Christina Gallagher, referred to myself as: ” That Mc Crory bastard; he’s responsible for all this.”

    Like

  21. Great piece by the Doctor.
    The most telling thing is that they never accept an honest challenge to come forward and explain themselves on topics such as the doctor raises in his letter.
    He exposes her as a barefaced liar in her denial about living in a six million dollar Malahide home
    and lying also about living happily with her husband when her own followers and the local clergy and people all know she has not done so
    for many years.
    The man she refers to as telling lies about her is myself. When she said she would sue me if I did not shut up I called her lawyer right away and told him that he had my blessing to do so.
    He hung up the phone. I continued my accusations and public investigation for months afterwards and not a suit did follow.
    I even challenged her to explain her lavish lifestyle on local kfrc radio ie Castlebar Community Radio but ner a peep from her or Fr. Mc Ginnity.
    Those of you who still believe in these two have only yourselves now to blame.

    Like

  22. It will only happen when Christ returns, but up till then the gates of hell will not close it down.
    I am a believer, but in the public message of the gospel not in the private revelation of a fraud.
    You are a true believer, which is code for someone who is not able to critically evaluate what is in front of them.
    By the way I was in Malahide today
    https://dialogueireland.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/house-of-prayer1-jan-202.pdf
    https://dialogueireland.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/house-of-prayer-2-sw1.pdf
    Kathy Grace to you from God our father and the Lord Jesus Christ

    Like

  23. To Name and address with the editor.

    Please remember when the Catholic Church closes down and you cannot get into the House of Prayer for protection of body and soul because you are a non-believer, remember you once had a choice. God Bless. A True Believer.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: