why haven’t you put the full judgement up on your site
instead you put this drivel
I see you only put on bits and pieces VERY CONVENIENT FOR YOU
why havent you put the full judgement up on your site
I assume that is a question? For the obvious reason that it is not up on the commercial court web site yet.
We have sight of a copy but wish to have the official version before putting it up.
http://www.eccourts.org/judgments/decisions/2012/HC/stkitts/SMLifeVenturesvSusanMorriceetal.pdf
What is alarming is that the site is down for 3 days? Has the site been taken down like DI’s in 2009 the subject of a DOS attack?
Who would have an interest in not having the judgement seen?
instead you put this drivel
Which particular drivel? This is the version of events written by a very devoted member of the Educo regime. We are not putting it out, merely doing what we always do giving people both sides of the argument. We are showing the version of events Educoists believe in.
I see you only put on bits and pieces VERY CONVENIENT FOR YOU
This indicates you have not actually read anything as this post is about a book written by a Quinn follower and has nothing to do with the judgement. Also if you have not seen the judgement how do you know our posts on the judgement are convenient to us?
Also we are clearly not interested in the oil dispute, only about the cultist attitudes and tendencies resulting from TQ on Susan Morrice, Sheila McCaffrey, and the broad body of Educoists who are obviously under his influence as Class B Shareholders. We note that the majority of people who use our site are concerned about one thing only getting their money and then moving on. After that has happened and it could be a long journey we will still be addressing the issues of cultist control.
http://dialogueireland.wordpress.com/about/
Filed under: Tony Quinn





Fellow Educoists I encourage you all to bring extra pen and paper to the unmissable Sept Meeting which will be the bestest ever with a phenomenal amount of new business material.
Topics included are:
– Forgery : I have a doctorate in this discipline myself from the University of East Paradise Island. Because I have so much other material we may only have time to cover the beginners (or clumsy)
module.
– Bizarre Loan Schemes: This is a particular favourite of mine specifically designed to punish and discriminate against anyone who might have the audacity to ask you an intelligent, relevant question
which you don’t wish to answer.
– Business Super Structure Design: Here I expand my famous ‘One Move’ philosophy into two short moves. This one has been used with dazzling effect by yours truly in recent years netting me a
cool 64,000 oil shares (I hope). Heres a quick synopsis of it:
– Good workers , promote them
– Bad workers , don’t promote them
Genius what? Actually we won’t bother goin over that module again, ye have it all there!
– Personal Security: Now as you all know I am an expert martial artist so when I was out shopping with my girlfriend and somebody pushed against me did I whip around with a devastating blow ?No
because as Spiderman would say “with great power comes great responsibility’ – instead I whipped out my trusty INE cheque book and swiftly wrote a $1.8 million security
cheque ( No No.. the cheque book itself was not forged only the means by which I obtained it)
Extra bonus material will include:
– How to alter the Space/Time continuum ( A bit like the pretend Q in Star Trek only I do it better) : I have used these techniques brilliantly : like when I was able to set the share price for the
Maranco shares two months AFTER the case was actually settled.
And when I was able to have my directors position ‘formalised’ 10 months BEFORE I was illegally
appointed. Brilliant huh?
– I will also be educo-ing you to have the neck to claim vindication in a court judgement when a High court Judge has completly rejected your sides’ evidence on at least five issues and described your actions as “bizarre”, “invalid”,”preposterous” ,etc.
I can’t believe Anonymous could make such a statement if they had read the actual judgement that was circulated to shareholders on 26th July. If they want to see real drivel they should examine what has been said by INE, comparing it to the actual court document. They detract attention from the real issues that were exposed in this case that effect class b shareholders.
If they are not a shareholder they should ask one for the document and the DRIVEL that was sent with it, most of them don’t want to read it because they can’t handle the truth.
Look again and see what the Judge has to say about how our company is being managed by the present board.
Wake up to the truth, the truth will set you free and then we might all get what we deserve.